Police Junior Officer Faces Disciplinary Charges: Accused of Insubordination and Disobedience

7

Source- Real News: A junior officer in the Police Force is facing disciplinary charges following an investigation.

The constable is accused of insubordination and disobedience to orders, charges reportedly made against him by a senior sergeant.

Reports say the probe was undertaken by a sergeant, who, at the conclusion of the investigation proffered two disciplinary charges against his junior.

Accordingly, the constable has been served with a copy of each charge and a date for his trial before a committee of high-ranking officers will be set.

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

 

 

CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR WHATS APP GROUP

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

7 COMMENTS

  1. Hope it’s not dull he want dull the youngster and the youngster refuse plenty a them police in ranks worthless

  2. Since this is an administrative law/administrative issue, I would consider participating depending on the circumstances.

    Administrative due process rights, administrative procedure act, employment contract, employment law, tort, and even criminal law may all be implicated in this matter.

  3. I dont know how this made news but it highlighted a lot shot comings about the disciplinary process in the rpfab. While the process mentioned above is correct until the committee of senior officers the end is flawed. Its not a committee but one senior officer who adjudicate over the matter, but one. Most of whom don’t understand the rules of evidence. As a matter of fact the fate of the junior officers In disciplinary matters are already predetermined. This is sometimes like a kangaroo court where a trial goes through even when the outcome is already known. Most of the officers who tries this cases except a few has never done any major investigations during their careers, barely been to court much less knows how the court system or rules of evidence works. But here they are ready to determine ones guilt or innocence. How can that be when one dont know evidence procedures. Most of the investigators are similar because the investigation process are not done properly. Office of professional standards are no different when it comes to these disciplines because their work is shabby and shady at it’s best. Plus here comes the old practice of, if you got reported means you did it hence the very poor investigation and very poor adjudication process where you are marched before a trial officer who has not even investigated a battery in their time in the force much less knows what goes on in a casefile. These disciplines should be brought before a committee independent of the police force where common sense and legal experience plays a part. Not before officers who already think you’re guilty even before the process starts.

  4. This definitely should not have made the news. No names, no charges, no stations. What really is the point? To let us know that admin gonna admin?
    I guess it did bring some engagement to the site, so…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here