PM Browne happy residents are still wearing masks in the absence of a mandate

1. I don’t care a rats ass what you’re happy about .
   I’m happy that hopefully this is your last term.
   I’m happy that you and your family although your wagons are loaded and overflowing from your “one for you one for me policies” will no longer be in a position of power .
   High unemployment
   Land give aways
   Bad roads
   Bad internet
   Electricity
   Water
   Infrastructure
   What has this self enricher done in all the years in office answer not very much.

2. They are just trying to hide their poor dentition and sad smileys 😔

3. Wearing of MASKS to protect yourself from ‘catching’ or spreading coronavirus is a visible IQ test.

   No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for HCW or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions.

   Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public.

   Furthermore, if there were any benefit to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask, yet several large meta-analyses, and all the RCT, prove that there is no such relative benefit.

   Masks and respirators do not work.

   By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle.

   In an absence of knowledge, governments should not make policies that have a hypothetical potential to cause harm. The government has an onus barrier before it instigates a broad social-engineering intervention, or allows corporations to exploit fear-based sentiments.

   Furthermore, individuals should know that there is no known benefit arising from wearing a mask in a viral respiratory illness epidemic, and that scientific studies have shown that any benefit must be residually small, compared to other and determinative factors.

   Otherwise, what is the point of publicly funded science?

   The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.

Comments are closed.