Murder Case Against Clarence Cameron Adjourned, Hearing Resumes December 10

6

The murder case against Clarence Cameron, accused of fatally stabbing 17-year-old Omarrie Graham on May 5, 2024, in Bendals, has been adjourned.

The delay, before Magistrate Ngaio Emanuel, stems from outstanding exhibits not yet provided to the defense. Graham reportedly sustained multiple stab wounds during an altercation on Middle Road.

Cameron’s committal hearing is set to resume on December 10, 2024.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

6 COMMENTS

  1. The misinformed speak from emotion and ignorance, and I understand.

    Do not be so hasty to cast judgement if you do not know all the facts.

  2. Remember we need all facts before we speak. I remember as soon as someone hear someone was shot, they are ready to crucify the shooter, not knowing or caring if the shooter was acting in self-defense. Antigua and Barbuda is a highly uneducated place and I never want to have to even defend my life there, as even then you could go to prison for lawfully defending yourself because Antiguans usually only focused on the result.

    They say things like, “you shoot him, you are wicked.” Not caring whether it is justified or not. Other ignorant bloggers would say, “he is always in something with shooting” not caring whether it was justified or whether the person is a community man that community members tend to ask for assistance or whether the person is or was a police officer or whether the person was being attacked

    Antigua and this is not based on anger, but there is some, is one of the most dunces, idiotic and backwards place you will ever find and this is based on research.

    All ministers of government, especially minister of justice/AG, minister of Education and PM, have failed a country if substantial amount of people in the country is still this idiotic. Past and present governments.

  3. Why is the defence not being given the exhibits by the prosecuting team?
    These actions make the judiciary seem incompetent. If there is a valid reason for the delay then that should be stated. For instance, if vital forensic evidence has not been received or if something outside of the prosecutions purview is still being awaited let the public know without sacrificing the viability of the case. That would result in the public’s understanding and belief in our courts.
    On the other hand if the sitting magistrate/judge should see that this is just a delaying tactics then the offending party, be it the prosecution or the defence should be charged. If no law is there to allow that then our learned officers within the legal department should begin the process to have the Attorney General’s office look into this.
    We claim that we want to see less lawlessness in our island, well then we have to take action that will deter it from happening and make certain that justice is sure and swift.

  4. MURDER CASE ADJOURNED…? WATCH IT ANR: …HEADLINE MISLEADING

    HERE IS WHY:

    (i) ‘…Magistrates possess no Jurisdiction to try ‘Murder Cases:

    (ii) …Such matters filed with the ‘…MAGISTRACY’ is strictly for ‘…COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS:

    (iii) …Documents are filed by the ‘…Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP):

    (iv) …Such filed ‘Documents’ shall be served:

    (a) …To the Magistrate’s Court: and

    (b) …On the ACCUSED:

    (v) …When the date is set, it is for the conduct of the ‘…Committal Proceedings:’

    (vi) …The ‘Accused is ‘NOT’ required to give evidence.’

    However, if legally represented, the ‘…Hired Attorney,’ having studied the filed and served ‘Documents,’ may make ‘…LEGAL SUBMISSIONS’ (Not No Case Submission) to the ‘…Committing Magistrate.’

    DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE SHALL SATISFY ‘COMMITTING MAGISTRATE’

    Should the ‘…Committing Magistrate’ be ‘…SATISFIED’ with the evidence disclosed, and contained in the filed ‘…Documents, His/her Worship,’ just simply ‘…COMMIT THE ACCUSED’ to stand trial before the ‘…CRIMINAL ASSIZES.’

    There can be no ‘…RESUMPTION’ of any proceedings, that had never ”…COMMENCED.’

    BE STILL, AND KNOW.

    Procedurally, it is that straightforward.

    that the evidence does not ‘SATISFY’ the ‘…MAGISTRATE’ that the ‘ACCUSED’ should be ‘COMMITTED TO STAND TRIAL’ at the ‘…CRIMINAL ASSISIZES.’

    (v) …’

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here