MP Simon Announces ‘Pan Yard Pull Up’ to Help Promote and Preserve Pan Culture

3

After raising concerns about this year’s Panorama competition and the future development of steel pan in our country, Hon. Kelvin Simon is happy that “the government has changed its tune.” 

Panorama 2024 is back on the Carnival events calendar and pan players and enthusiasts can look forward to a showcase of this highly popular art form.

Simon believes that the government’s priorities are misplaced and that they do not fully appreciate the socioeconomic impact of the country’s cultural heritage.

To this end, the St. Mary’s South Parliamentary representative will be organizing a Pan Yard Pull Up.

The event, which will be held during the third week in July, will encourage the public to visit various pan yards for a “behind the scenes peek into the life of a pan player.” It will be shared via social media to increase awareness and support for the Panorama competition.

The M.P. is highly critical of the government’s last minute negotiations surrounding the Panorama competition. He describes it as insensitive and unacceptable politics that left pan players who are cultural ambassadors, with few options and little time to explore alternative sponsorship arrangements.

“The political theatrics and negative publicity surrounding this important cultural event were totally unnecessary. 

The negotiations ended with the Antigua and Barbuda Pan Association (ABPA) getting $330,000 instead of $300,000, a mere 10% increase. The ABPA must still raise $100,000 in ticket sales, which is three times more than the Festivals Commission 2023 ticket sales,” Simon stated.

M.P. Simon recommends that instead of giving the ABPA a “basket to carry water”, the Festivals Commission should focus on lending more assistance in the promotion and preservation of our cultural assets through various community entrepreneurship initiatives.

“Every year they spend money on the ‘One Nation Concert’, which features overseas artists and is free to the public. So why is the burden of marketing Panorama thrust onto the pan fraternity? How can the government boast of record tourism arrivals and be so shortsighted when it comes to investing in the development of culture?” Simon asks.

The Opposition M.P. is calling on the general public to support the Pan-Yard Pull Up. He is also calling on corporate sponsors to support cultural development that the nation desperately needs for economic recovery. 

“We are the ones that must demonstrate that we are committed to the development and preservation of our culture. Let us reject this type of “political manipulation” that has become synonymous with the Gaston Browne administration. They make announcements that throw us into a state of chaos and then “change their tune” to appear as if they are rescuing the country from the confusion that they have created,” Simon said.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

3 COMMENTS

  1. “Hon. Kelvin Simon is happy that “the government has changed its tune.”

    What is wrong with these UPP politicians and their statements today? First it was Little Richard Lewis, and now is Simple Kelvin Simon.

    The government did NOT change any tune. It is the Pan Association that has changed its tune. The government’s position has always been consistent in this matter: $330,000. The Pan Association rejected that offer, but later accepted $1Million over three years and this works out to be $333,000. Effectively, it is still the same thing.

    Simple Simon, like Little Richard, learn to simply say well done and move on. You’re trying too hard to score points where there are none on offer.

  2. @Wash hand. What you state is “simply” not true. Only 300,000 was offered with tickets to make up the difference. The 330,000 came after the fact. But, the substance of this is missed conviently. For about a decade the amount given was 400,000. Last year the association was given 300,00 plus a 100,000 that was owed that makes it 400,000 and the association said, we will work with that. It is in bad faith and in extremely bad taste that the govt decides to force 300,000 on them once again. It is clear that they intended to “bad play” the association and who but a Labourite would accept that kind of treatment?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here