Lovell says ABLP failed to deliver on water and cost of living after three terms, urges voters to demand change

18

United Progressive Party (UPP) candidate for All Saints West Harold Lovell says the government has had three terms to resolve key national issues such as water and roads but has failed to deliver, arguing that voters should now demand a change in leadership.

Speaking on Observer Radio’s Connecting with Dave Lester Payne, Lovell criticised the administration led by Prime Minister Gaston Browne, saying longstanding problems remain unresolved despite repeated mandates.

“If you give somebody a job to do, and they go through one term… they don’t do it. They beg for a second term… they don’t do it. They’ve come back for a third term, and they still haven’t done it,” Lovell said, referring to the country’s ongoing water issues.

“There can be no excuses for that,” he added, arguing that the government lacks a systematic plan to address major challenges.

Lovell said the administration has been “lurching from really one crisis to another,” pointing to water shortages, deteriorating roads and the rising cost of living as key concerns raised by residents.

On infrastructure, he criticised the government’s road programme, saying there is no clear strategy guiding spending despite a 40 percent increase in vehicle licensing fees.

“You don’t have a road construction and maintenance plan… they’re just spending money and not spending it in a wise way,” he said.

He also questioned how contracts are awarded, alleging that decisions are driven by political influence rather than competence.

“Contracts are not given out on the basis of competence… it’s on the basis of who can get a blight from the minister,” Lovell said, adding that pricing decisions are being handled by Cabinet rather than technical experts.

Lovell said the result is poor-quality work, citing roads that have already begun to deteriorate shortly after completion.

“It is a waste of taxpayers’ money,” he said.

He also took aim at what he described as politically driven social support programmes, particularly the distribution of food vouchers, arguing that benefits are not allocated fairly.

“The way in which the vouchers are distributed… it is totally unfair,” he said, claiming that only government ministers and candidates have access to them while opposition representatives do not.

Lovell argued that this creates dependency and political advantage, saying assistance should instead be based on clear criteria accessible to all citizens.

“It cannot be that I am a friend of the minister… and I get the benefit,” he said.

More broadly, he accused the administration of relying on short-term measures timed around elections rather than implementing sustainable policies.

“You have not seen any well-thought-out programmes that are going to extend over a period of time,” Lovell said, pointing to temporary tax relief measures as examples of “sweeteners” designed for electoral gain.

He also raised concerns about transparency in government decision-making, including uncertainty surrounding road projects and negotiations with overseas contractors.

“We don’t know exactly what happened… it’s a secret,” he said.

Lovell further questioned the government’s handling of external pressures, including visa restrictions affecting Antiguans and Barbudans, saying the public has not been given clear explanations or a plan of action.

“Why is this whole thing shrouded in secrecy?… what are they telling us as a people?” he asked.

On economic pressures, he challenged claims that the government is cushioning rising fuel prices, arguing that the impact has not yet been felt and that such statements are misleading.

“It’s just smoke and mirrors trying to fool people,” Lovell said.

Looking ahead, Lovell said the UPP will campaign on what he described as an “issues-driven” platform focused on lowering the cost of living, improving infrastructure and restoring fairness in public services.

“Which administration is better able to address the needs of the people… in a way that is sustainable and fair?” he said.

He added that voters dissatisfied with current conditions should not stay home on election day.

“Not voting cannot be a solution… let’s make a change and at least give the United Progressive Party an opportunity,” Lovell said.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

18 COMMENTS

  1. Lovell want a change for what and to what?

    With all the water investments and other strategic resources in place, what else he want?

    What can he do for Antiguans and Barbudans?

  2. Dear Mr Lovell
    I just listened to my representative, Hon. Richard Lewis on Observer, and I must say that was a master class of an MP going out there and representing his constituency.
    He did not get into the drama of what UPP is in right now, but he outlined the problems in his constituency and how he is helping to alleviate some of them according to his capabilities.
    He talked about his advocacy over the years starting the day after the UPP lost the 2023 elections. He told of the many projects he has undertaken even at his own expense. The people I spoke to after hearing him are very proud of him. He is also very vocal in his representation in Parliament. We are very fortunate to have him here.
    He is articulate, quick-thinking, methodical. He is especially very caring about the people he represents and his love for his constituency where he was born. He is not an MP that you have to light candle to go and look for.

    This is my advice to you, Mr Lovell, whether you will be the leader or not, because the one there now is not making it. Please advise the other caretakers to take a page out of Mr Lewis; book and go out there and try to promote the work they are doing in their constituency. If they do so then because one one full basket, maybe UPP might be able to add up the hard work undertaken in each constituency and pull off a win.
    They have to promote their constituencies and not try to solve the problems of the UPP and its present shenanigans. Things don’t look good for the party. Try to embrace those who are working hard and encourage those who are not to stop the plenty talk and start the hard work.

    This includes you too. You had 2 hours this week and most of what you did was to relive the past. Get with it. You can do better than that.
    Big up to my representative. My MP. The Honorable Richard Lewis, member for St John’s Rural West.

  3. Of course they failed..
    These people haven’t even fulfilled 1/3 of their campaign promises in 12 years, and they are already calling for an election after just three failed years in their current term.
    Call election to do what, just to disappoint the people more with their failed agenda.

    In the 6 years, roughly two terms since COVID strike the world, this administration has taken the island nation nowhere.
    In fact we have fell off in many categories that Antigua was leading in..

    Not even our cricket we have to be proud of these days, and our culture has been sold out to foreigners. This is why many Antiguan’s in the dispora won’t even attempt to come back home to live, because they don’t even recognize their place of birth anymore.

    This is not just us rambling, it’s of a truth that the place has gone to the dogs, literally.

    All the dilapidated buildings tell the story, and the city is stinky to high heavens without even proper facilities for someone to take a leak.

    If these are the people in leadership to take us forward in the next 25 years, then we are doom to misery.

    Just look at the crime rate, just look.
    We need more honest people in politics, and not just those who are out to rob and scheme from the people.
    We have lost Antigua to robbers and theives..and everyone in Antigua knows that.

    Think people, think.

  4. The leadership of the UPP only have time to cuss out the one or two MPs who working hard in their constituencies. They are so full of resentment for some of their fellow members that they cannot see that it has damaged the party.

    How is that change helpful? It makes Franz look like he couldn’t wait to flee. Who now will want to go to City South?

    Maybe Gisele Isaacs will go this time. Before Michael Burton she said it was to be she but she let Burton go before her. Like if anybody believed that crap. The woman is lazy. Only want to run the UPP from her bed in her nightie and writing stories in the newspaper.

    The UPP has no dynamism at its head. The chairman just wants to tell off people who displease her, the leader has become very boast and full of himself, and the secretary has the record for the most invisible political party secretary. She is what you call a disappearing act, especially at a time where she is most needed to big up the party, she is sitting in the office of a former leader and counting his money.
    How does UPP expect to win when the 3 most important persons in the party are so dysfunctional?

  5. IMF
    ROMANTIC RHYTHMS
    ABST HOTEL RIPOFF
    WADADLI POWER CAN’T
    CANT PARK AT EAST BUS STATION
    BANKING SECTOR COLLAPSER
    BAICO COLLAPSER
    ANTI-UWI FIVE ISLANDS CAMPUS

  6. @ A gleam of light for UPP

    Sadly that is how both parties operate. Instead of pointing out what they will be doing, they point out what the other party has not done.

    This is a double edged sword as the the failings they are pointing out were the same things that happened under their tenures.

    Problem with stating what they will be doing is that when they get into office the first thing they will say is that the treasury is empty and so they are not able to honor their promises.

    We all know the drills and tactics of both parties.

    We need new blood in both parties.

  7. Now witness the difference between UPP supporters and ABLP ones.

    I’ve just read the balanced comments from @A gleam of light for the UPP, and his support for the Most Honourable Richard Lewis was very admiral, but he also went on to criticise the Most Honourable Harold Lovell as well. I’ve no problem with this at all.

    However, on the other hand, you never hear the same type of critique from ABLP supporters of their own Members of Parliament. Why not?

    They go on like their Ministers have never done any wrongdoings at all; and their political excretions do not stink!!! 🫢

    Remember ABLP acolytes and sycophantic Gastonites, sometimes your silence is perceived as complicity…

    Yellow & blue 🟨🟦🟨🟦 all day long.

  8. It’s honestly sad to see comments from people who claim to have sense, yet completely miss the point. The level of blind loyalty and inability to interpret a simple message is alarming.
    If these comments are coming from Labour supporters, that’s one thing — it’s expected. But when they come from UPP supporters, it’s even more disappointing.
    Pringle has had over two years to prove he has the leadership qualities needed to move the party forward. He has not demonstrated the ability to lead, unify, or inspire confidence. Meanwhile, support continues to decline.
    Can’t you see what’s happening? People are walking away.
    At some point, reality has to take precedence over emotion. Pringle, do the right thing for the party — step down as leader.

  9. @The UPP top leadership is dysfunctional

    “The woman is lazy. Only want to run the UPP from her bed in her nightie and writing stories in the newspaper.” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    YOU A KILL ME WID THIS COMMENT YAH. A WAH COLOUR SHE NIGHTIE BE???

  10. So what you are saying @Smh, is that anyone with a differing viewpoint from ABLP ones (or yourself) should put up and shut up?

    Hey, a vibrant democracy doesn’t work like that!

    If, as it seems that you are very sensitive to opposing views, maybe politics isn’t for you. May I suggest you involve yourself in some other genteel and relaxing activity … like gardening or something else 🤣

    UPP all day long … 🟨🟦🟨🟦

    I love to write, it’s so relaxing.and so easy 😉

  11. @real this is exactly the problem in Antigua — people either can’t read or simply can’t interpret the message. What I said clearly went completely over your head. There’s really no point going any further with you because you’re being hard-headed and not trying to understand. Maybe you should get a second opinion from someone unbiased — hopefully that might help it click.

  12. @brixtonian I’m pretty sure I’m half your age and still operating with far more intellect, especially based on your comment about “watering the garden.” You clearly failed to interpret the message, so let me break it down for you.
    Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but not their own facts. The reality is simple—anyone with even a basic level of sense should be able to see that Mr. Pringle does not demonstrate the capacity, charisma, or intellect required to lead a country. That’s not disrespect; I’m sure he’s a decent person. But let’s be real—I call it as it is.
    Do you get it now? Probably not, but hopefully this at least gives you something to think about going forward.

  13. Nice try at obfuscation @Smh, but let’s the readers decide for themselves whose ” operating with far more intellect” shall we.

    I’m confident in my own abilities, and what I’ve read from your previous ANR comments, I definitely won’t be needing any advice from the likes of you!

    Again, as I mentioned earlier, everyone is entitled to their opinion, whether it’s me, you or Crusty Magoo (🤣) That’s free speech in a democratic country. It’s that simple…

  14. … And never forget @Smh, Gaston’s power base emits from the overall control of the media airwaves especially the ABLP propaganda state owned broadcasting television news ABS.

    Brainwashing comes in all guises, don’t you know?

  15. @brixtonian I’ll be the bigger person here and take constructive criticism from you, and I hope you’ll do the same. You come across as an intelligent person, but there seems to be some confusion because I can’t understand why you would challenge my point when the facts are clearly there to see.
    I just wish more Antiguans would approach discussions with an open mind instead of being blinded by party loyalty.

Comments are closed.