Letter to the Editor: Accountability Needed in ECCB Governor’s Residence Project
Dear Editor,
The construction of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank ECCB Governor’s residence has raised serious concerns regarding financial oversight. Initially budgeted at EC$7 million, the project’s cost has now escalated to EC$22 million, with no clear explanation for the massive increase.
This situation demands immediate scrutiny. Public funds must be managed with transparency and accountability, yet there appears to be little justification for the additional expenditures. Who approved this cost increase? Were proper procurement procedures followed? What factors contributed to such a significant budget overrun?
At a time when economic challenges affect many in the Eastern Caribbean, such spending raises serious questions about priorities. Financial institutions should lead by example, ensuring fiscal responsibility and demonstrating prudent financial management. The lack of transparency surrounding this project risks eroding public confidence in the institutions tasked with safeguarding economic stability.
An independent audit is necessary to provide clarity on how funds have been allocated and to ensure accountability. The public deserves answers and reassurance that financial management within key institutions meets the highest standards. Without transparency, trust will continue to erode.
Sincerely,
Layman
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
That castle is to house one man and his nuclear family? Wow! Talk about overdo.
A governor’s residence should be respectable, but does it really need to be a palace?
Public funds should go toward improving the economy, not extravagant housing!
If the private sector is funding this, then fine, but if taxpayers are involved, we need answers!
Meanwhile, ordinary citizens struggling to afford rent—where are the priorities? SMH
Would love to see this same level of investment in public infrastructure and education
I hope transparency is provided on who is funding this project and why it’s necessary.
The time has come that progress in our region should encourgage progressive thinking. The ECCB Governor’s Residences have always been palatial at the times they were built. When Sir Cecil Jacobs occupied the dwelling at Fortlands Bassterre it was quite palatial for its times. No one outside knew there was a bedroom for the dog. We didd not know of the grand size of the rooms that were themed. No one outside knew of the with mutiple kitchens and dining rooms on different levels and in the court yard.
In 2025, the focus should not be wanting to put our limits of thought and understanding on the standards of housing we create for our heads of state, government, and public institutions. We should not display our limited appreciation for increasing standards and future thinking. Please recognise that while we are debating whether such a palatial resident is befitting the head of our premier monetary institution or not, the recommendation out there is to pass this property on to the Government of Saint Kitts and Nevis for the head of state or government. Why not the Governor and future Governors of the ECCB?
This type of bickering is beneath us. $22 million XCD or 8 million USD on this property is a worthy investment on the property if it is well built and can serve the bank for the next 25 to 40 years. The building is not about the man who is in the seat today, but about for progressive forward look of the Bank.
Just build de darn ting and worrry about more important matters please.
DenVau
The creaming by the few elitist leeching oligarchs; is manifested in greed personified: When artful self-enrichment takes it’s due. They don’t give a damn about me or you. Except when the prison walls reverberate: and cry for redemption from the firing squad. Too late will be the cry.
It’s not your money talk is cheap but whisky cost money,
It is an issue, as DenVau fails to put, as to whether we should or should not increase our benefits and perks and ignore the reality of why we’re providing services or facilities to improve or stimulate growth, economic and other facets.
There are other issues pointed to:
1. Was the procurement process transparent, was any entity, within the economic union, capable of providing the services to design and or build the structure able to place a competitive bid?
2. How is it managed, and how are overruns limited, justified and approved – are there parameters and checks?
3. What changes would justify a 200% increase in a project that was already costly? Are they necessary or did we move away from the initial project brief?
4. Is the economy of the monetary union able to afford the new structure, either at the initial value or at the increased costs.
5. How do we justify to the people in the economic union the importance of managing money and ensuring value gains are reflected in economic growth when we spend that much, beyond the budgetary allocation of funds, on frills?
If the Bank provides housing then the Building belongs to the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Bank. A home of such splendor is extravagant to say the least and quite unnecessary.
It would interesting to know what is the appraised value when completed.
Comments are closed.