A site visit to Dove Trail Beach today will provide the High Court with a firsthand look at the location of a January 2020 attack at the center of an attempted murder trial.
During Thursday’s proceedings, crime scene photos showed significant blood evidence in the suspect’s vehicle and on the roadway, aligning with the prosecution’s timeline.
Testimony established that the accused and complainant met in 2018 when the accused was 17. Their relationship involved financial exchanges, including a $100 loan the accused couldn’t repay. Evidence suggests this led to an arrangement for sexual contact, but the accused allegedly attacked the victim before it began.
The defense argues the accused acted in self-defense after being held by the neck. The trial, which began Monday, is nearing its conclusion.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
it would be helpful if these visits were more frequent to better understand the context of complex cases like this one.
It’s commendable that the court is taking the time to visit the scene of the alleged crime.
Only now?? After all this time?
“And he looked toward Sodom and Gomorrah, and toward all the land of the plain, and beheld, and, lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.”
WHAT THE HELL…? …PROVIDE HIGH COURT WITH FIRSTHAND LOOK…?
Some of these Court reporters are ‘…COMPLETE FRAUDS.’
WHY?
Many seemed not to have been able to ‘PUT THE STORY’ in the right context.
ANR SHALL ‘…TAKE NO DARN BLAME,’ for that which commenter has written.
NOW:
(i) ‘…When ‘…LOCUS IN QUO- is ever mentioned, it is the ‘…SCENE’ where the crime reportedly occurred:
(ii) …Some members of the Jury, may not have any ‘…GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE’ of some places of the nation:
(iii) Thus, either:
(a) ‘…DEFENCE ATTORNEY: or
(b) …CROWN PROSECUTOR,’ may wish to suggest to the ‘…TRIAL JUDGE,’ that in the interest of:
(i) ‘…KNOWLEDGE OF THE JURY: and
(ii) …INTEREST OF, AND FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE: that
(ii) …THOSE, IN WHOSE HANDS, THE ‘…ACCUSED FATE REST,’ SHALL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE FOR THEMSELVES THE AREA THE INCIDENT OCCURED.’
***
A LITTLE TIP: …WHAT THE HELL…?
Such visit often spurred the ‘…IMAGINATION.’
FOR INSTANCE, WHEN THE CANADIAN VISITOR TOOK:
(i) ‘…HIS WIFE: and
(ii) …FIVE-YEAR-OLD SON TO ‘…DEVIL’S BRIDGE AT ‘…5 OR 5.30,’ with explanation that ‘HE’ wanted them to ‘…SEE THE SUN RISE,’ IT SEEMS ONLY:
(i) ‘…THE POLICE: and
(ii) …TOURISM OFFICIALS BELIEVED.’
CRIME SOLVING:
Professionally, ‘…CRIME SOLVERS,’ have neither:
(a) ‘…EMPATHY: nor
(b) …SYMPATHY.’
Among that which are needed, are ‘…ABILITY AND TACT.’
***
FRAUD: AWL AH DEM:
‘…Ah Fraud.’
***
UNDERSTANDING:
The visit has never been to ‘SEE IF A CRIME HAD ACTUALLY COMMITTED AT A PARTICULAR SPOT.’
***
PROFESSIONALLY: …FACTUALLY AND ACTUALLY:
(a) …WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME:
(b) …EROSION OF SOIL-WATER/WIND: and
(c) …VEGETATION GROWTH,’ not one darn thing presented to the ‘COURT’ at ‘
‘…TRIAL’ would be seen.
***
Not even if the ‘JURORS’ had:
(i) ‘…BIFOCAL LENSES: or
(ii) …MAGNIFYING GLASSES.’
***
‘…Soe nah dig nutten’ (Vernacular).
***
And if the appetite calls for ‘…MUTTON,’ ketch ah Hag.’
NOT FROM KING OBSTINATE, THOUGH.
***
HE MIGHT SING: SUM BADY TIEF ME HAG’ {Vernacular).
***
WALK GOOD.
They are not so interested in solving, charging and bringing to justice. They are going at length to get the full mella, a mella them lub.
Set the young man free, he was young and this vampire as the telephone conversation suggested went after him. Not saying he got what he deserved but he too is to be equally blamed. He did not want no 100.00 back. He wanted a back ride. Sounds like the young man or boy really did not want to be engaged with no homosexual activity.
Comments are closed.