Deon Lloyd, a Lower Ottos resident, has been remanded until March 26 after appearing in court on Monday, accused of murdering Jevon Williams in a January 2 shooting. Lloyd, who sustained injuries during the altercation and appeared with his right hand in a cast, is represented by attorney Wendel Alexander.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
You claim self defense let’s say that’s indeed the case. Now are you a licensed firearm holder?? Hmmm
Being or not being a licensed firearms holder in not the grounds that constitute self defense. The police now have to add or don’t add the additional charges.
Real man fight with their fists not with guns and knives. Times have really changed. Back in the days I enjoyed watching these fist fights among the peers in the community. The older folks used to throw water on them to behave themselves. I wish fist fight was one tradition we had brought into the twenty first century.
In Jamaica, they have recorded their 34 murders for 2025.
3-MEN IN THE MOUNTAIN- BOGGY PEAK: …SYMBOLICALLY NAMED MOUNT OBAMA
(i) ‘…ONE DEAD:
(ii) …ONE WOUNDED: and
(iii) …ONE SURVIVED.’
***
FIRST OFFICIALLY-RECORDED MURDER AT MOUNT OBAMA:
From professional knowledge, the ‘…FIRST MURDER’ recorded as being committed at ‘…MOUNT OBAMA’ [ANR: January 2, 2025].
(a) ‘…Murder Victim: ‘…JEVON WILLIAMS: and
(b) …Murder-Accused: …DEON LLOYD.’
***
COMMUNITIES:
(i) ‘…OLD ROAD (Deep South of the Island): and
(ii) … LOWER OTTOS (Periphery of Capital City- St. John’s).
***
INVESTIGATIVE CURIOSITY:
From these two extreme communities, just ‘…What may have led to their presence at ‘…MOUNT OBAMA?’
***
WEAPONRY REPORTED USED:
(a) ‘…CUTLASS/MACHETTE: and a
(b) …FIREARM.’
***
PROFESSIONAL INVESTIGATIVE PERSPECTIVE:
No Investigator shall ever assume that:
(i) ‘…The ‘DECEASED’ and ‘…SURVIVING SIBLING’ were at ‘…MOUNT OBAMA’ to ‘…CUT TWIGS’ for ‘…FISHPOT-MAKING:
It shall also never be assumed that:
(ii) ‘…The ‘MURDER-ACCUSED’ was at ‘…MOUNT OBAMA’ hunting ‘Mountain Pigeons.’
NOBODY REALLY KNOWS:
***
EVEN SO:
Criminal Investigators know that except for:
(a) ‘…FARMING,’ no person go into the ‘…MOUNTAIN’ with a ‘…CUTLASS/MACHETE:
(b) Except ‘…HUNTING’ or for:
(i) ‘…SELF-PROTECTION:
(ii) …ADVERSARIAL/ANTICIPATED ATTACK.’
***
INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC
Investigative Logic always suggests that when persons left home ‘…ARMED,’ that in ‘…CRIMINAL TRIALS,’ Adjudicators are open to ‘DRAW REASONABLE INFERENCE’ that such persons left in ‘…PREPARATION FOR THE COMMISSION OF AN OFFENCE.’
***
QUESTION:
How say you, my esteem and most learned ‘…COUNSELS, CHARLESWORTH TABOR’ and WENDELL ALEXANDER?’
***
OBSERVATION:
ANR’s news reporters appear not to have known or unwilling to ‘LEARN’ that ‘…MAGISTRATES’ POWERS OF REMAND’ is ‘…LEGALLY RESTRICTED’ to ‘…7-DAYS’ at any ‘…FIRST INSTANCE REMAND APPEARANCE, AND CONTINUANCE.’
Given the ‘…REMAND TIME TO MARCH 26,’ a ‘Magistrate’ would have ‘…EXCEEDED HIS/HER POWERS.’
***
ANR Reporters may enquire of ‘…ANY MAGISTRATE,’ if ‘…MARCH 26’ [1-News Paragraph] is not just for the purposes of:
(a) ‘…CASE MENTION: and
(b) …TO ASCERTAIN THE PROGRESS BEING MADE (Not with the Investigation), but:
with:
(i) ‘…THE PREPARATION: and
(ii) …READINESS OF THE CASE FILE: to
(iii) …COMMENCE ‘…COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS.’
***
PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE (POLICE PROSECUTOR), ‘…KNOW THAT: …BEEN THERE: …DONE THAT.’
WALK GOOD.
***
Only the court can determine whether the case was self defense. The Police have the obligation to charge him for murder. Later in the court , the court will reduce it to manslaughter base on the evidence before the court. When the Jurors return with their verdict, they are the ones who will say it was self defense. The Police have no right to come to the conclusion that is was self defense. That is not the Police function
I can’t remember if I read this for this case but is this the incident where guy 1 had the altercation with another guy, got chopped, left the scene, returned with a firearm and shot the other guy? If correct, it will be tough I think to prove self defense. Despite being hurt, if you’ve left the scene, then your life is no longer in danger. Returning to the scene to then shoot the other guy comes off as premeditated . Just my understanding of this kind of situation according to gun laws. I’m open to being corrected tho
BENEFIT OF KNOWLEDGE: …MURDER…? …JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE
Seems some commenters are not sure of the ‘…CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS.’
***
DEPRIVATION OF LIFE:
The ‘…Constitution Order’ anticipated that at some point in time, a person shall be ‘…DEPRIVED OF LIFE.’
This might be done:
(a) ‘…LAWFULLY: and
(b) …JUSTIFIABLY.’
***
WHAT OBTAINS:
These are that which shall ‘…OBTAIN:’
(a) ‘…No person shall be deprived of his/her life ‘…INTENTENTIONALLY,’ save in the ‘…EXECUTION’ of a ‘…SENTENCE’ of a Court.’
TWO CRIMES:
(b) …The ‘…CRIMES’ that mandated the ‘…DEATH PENALTY,’ are:
(i) …TREASON: (Against the …KING: …HEIRS: …SUCCESSORS): and
(ii) …MURDER (Premeditation: …Malice Aforethought: …Expressed/Implied).
***
NOW:
The Constitution states:
‘…A person shall ‘Not’ be regarded as being ‘…DEPRIVED OF LIFE,’ if he ‘…DIES’ as the result of:
(i) ‘…THE USE OF:
(ii) …TO SUCH EXTENT: and
(iii) …SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES: as
(iv) …PERMITTED BY LAW: and
(v) …REASONABLE JUSTIFIABLE.’
***
THE CIRCUMSTANCES:
(i) ‘…For the ‘Defence’ of ‘…ANY PERSON: or
(ii) …For the ‘DEFENCE of PROPERTY:
(iii) …In order to effect a ‘…LAWFUL ARREST’ (Citizen-ONLY at Common Law: POLICE at Common and Statute Law):
(iv) …For the purpose of suppressing:
(a) ‘…RIOT:
(b) …INSURRECTION: or
(c) …MUTINY:
(d) …In order, ‘…LAWFULLY’ to prevent the ‘…COMMISSION’ by that person of a criminal offence: or
(e) …As the result of a ‘…LAWFUL ACT OF WAR’ [CO: 1981: Section 5].
NOTE:
IT
THE LATTER OF THESE, ARE MATTERS FOR THE ‘…SECURITY FOIRCES.’
PROCEDURES:
Though not necessarily outlined in the ‘…CONSTITUTION ORDER,’ there are procedures to be followed to determine:
(a) ‘…JUSTIFIABLE HOMICIDE (SELF-DEFENCE/PROTECTION): or
(b) …MURDER’-CRIMINAL TRIAL TO DETERMINE:
(i) ‘…CONVICTION: or
(ii) …ACQUITTAL.’
***
SUGGESTION: …For the ‘…BENEFIT OF KNOWLEDGE:’
READ, FOR YOURSELVES, THE ‘…CONSTITUTION ORDER- 1981.’
***
KNOW YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHHT: …DO’S AND DONT’S.’
***
EVEN AT HOME, ‘…LEARN WELL.’
***