COMMENTARY: Gays Are Citizens Too

Actual LGBT pride flag

By Sir Ronald Sanders

(The writer is Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to the US and the OAS.  He is also a Senior Fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies at the University of London and at Massey College in the University of Toronto.  The views expressed are his own)

A regressive 19th century law, that is a legacy of British rule, continues to exist in 10 of the 12 independent Commonwealth Caribbean states. 

The law, inspired by the 1553 Buggery Act in England, was imposed on all British colonies by the colonial government in Britain in 1861.  It effectively outlawed homosexuality.

The two independent Commonwealth Caribbean countries that have done away with this archaic law, which, it should be emphasised, was not enacted by Caribbean legislators, are The Bahamas and Belize.    The law also does not exist in Haiti and Suriname which, together with the 12 independent Commonwealth countries, comprise the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).

In one of the 10 countries, Trinidad and Tobago, a High Court judgement ruled that sections of the existing law, which criminalize buggery between consenting adults, “are unconstitutional and should be struck down”.  So, there has been action by the judiciary to reject the consequences on the Trinidad and Tobago society of a law imposed by colonial England one hundred and fifty-seven years ago.

The law was not imposed by Britain in 1861 because there was a demand for it within its many colonies at the time.   It was reportedly imposed to protect British soldiers and colonial administrators from “corruption” out of a fear that these men sent far from home (and their women) would turn to homosexuality.  

Of course, the law has long since been discarded within Britain itself.  Today, homosexual men and women play leading and public roles in every aspect of British society, including its government. 

Other former colonies of Britain have also repealed this archaic law.  Among these countries are Australia, Canada, South Africa, New Zealand and most recently India. 

The discarding of laws, that discriminated against citizens based on their sexual orientation, has unleashed economic activity and productivity in all these countries.  People who lived lives of fear, closeted from the society and afraid to participate to the full extent of their talents and creativity, are now freely contributing to government, the arts, and the advancement of their countries’ economies in unprecedented ways.

Holding back any society on the basis of any form of discrimination – gender, race, religion and sexuality – stunts it, depriving it of talent, expertise and productivity that would otherwise contribute to its growth and development. 

Of the over 200 nations in the world, only 70 retain laws that discriminate against its citizens based on their sexuality.  Of those 70 countries, 35 are in the Commonwealth – all of them retaining the law imposed upon them by colonial England.  The majority of these Commonwealth countries are in Africa (13), followed by the Caribbean (10) the Asian region (6), and the Pacific (6).

This “Commonwealth” problem had been identified by the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on which I served as a member and Rapporteur between 2010 and 2011.  In our report, “A Commonwealth of the People: Time for Urgent Reform” submitted to the 2011 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Australia, we recommended that: “Heads of Government should take steps to encourage the repeal of discriminatory laws that impede the effective response of Commonwealth countries to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and commit to programmes of education that would help a process of repeal of such laws”.

The EPG cast the repeal of these discriminatory laws in the context of curbing the spread of HIV/AIDS because Commonwealth countries comprised over 30 per cent of the world’s population and over 60 per cent of people living with HIV resided in them. We recognised that discriminatory laws made homosexuals outlaws and, therefore, deterred persons suffering with HIV from seeking medical attention, lest they be imprisoned. The human carnage was sizeable; it was also needless.

There was much discussion within the EPG about whether to include this recommendation, not because we had any reservation about its rightness, but because a few of us feared – me included – that some leaders would be motivated by their fear of repealing the buggery law to discard the entire report and, with it, solid recommendations for urgent reform of a withering Commonwealth.

Eventually, the recommendation was included because of the persuasive arguments of two members of the EPG – Michael Kirby,a former Justice of the High Court of Australia, and Asma Jahangir (now deceased), a Pakistani human rights lawyer who served as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. 

Their argument was simple but compelling:  No person should be denied the right to live their lives in equality with other citizens because of who they are in terms of race, political persuasion, religious beliefs, gender or sexual orientation.  Kirby acknowledged that the path to achieve this objective is not easy, but he reminded me and other members of the group that, when we fought against the wrongs of apartheid in Southern Africa, we knew that we were arrayed against mighty forces of bigotry, racism and political interest; yet we fought because we knew that what existed was wrong.

The discriminatory laws against homosexuality, and other forms of sexual behaviour by consenting adults, continue to be defended by a few churches.  In the Caribbean and Africa, these churches are predominantly foreign and dogmatic, and lawmakers are made hesitant to repeal these laws in the face of their assertive influence on local populations.

But, other churches offer progressive views.  For instance, the General Convention of the Episcopal Church has declared that “homosexual persons are children of God who have a full and equal claim with all other persons upon the love, acceptance, and pastoral concern and care of the Church”, and Pope Francis has observed, “If someone is gay and searches for the Lord, who am I to judge?”.

The ten Commonwealth Caribbean countries are burdened by colonial left-overs, including ancient and imposed anti-homosexual laws; it is time for them to move on and join the progressive nations of the world by freeing their citizens in equality. 

Responses and previous commentaries:

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]


  1. Has anyone ever claimed that gays are NOT citizens? What is the point the writer is trying to make? Gay, straight, bent, curved – all are citizens of this Earth. The serious question is regarding citizenry in the New Earth to come.


    Not sure if a country’s ‘…progress-‘ socioeconomic, political or otherwise, would
    be stunted for reasons of not allowing ‘…homosexuality,’to pervade the society,
    whether conveniently or intellectually disguised under ‘…discrimination’ .

    In a nation that acknowledges the ‘…Supremacy of God’ [Founding Constitutional
    Principle A], many have not only rebuffed and rejected suggestions of
    ‘…revolutionizing abnormal sexual behavior’ in the society, but have found them
    ‘…outrageous, offensive and objectionable.’

    To eliminate this ‘…Principle’ necessitate constitutional alteration [CO: 1981:
    Section 47]. No administration, even with a desire, may have the fortitude to do so.

    As much as some may derive ‘…sexual pleasures from orifices not intended,’ not sure
    if that which God has commanded can be achieved from the ‘…rear-ends of men.’

    Citizens accept the use of the orifice or productive organ that God has created for ‘…multiplication and replenishment of the earth.’

    While Sir Ron argues a view point on the ‘…citizen status’, people take issue only
    with acts of immorality, specifically- ‘…deviant or abnormal sexual behavior.’

    Many have taken umbrage with advocates, irrespective of intellect or status, for
    suggesting ‘…stunted growth’ in the nation for not giving in to internal and external
    pressures in trending with other nations.

    All nations to their own order.

    Those that harbor thoughts of evolutionary existence, and believed that they were
    evolved into human beings, might very well be ‘…guilty of blasphemy.’

    While man is free, constitutionally,such acts or sexual behavior are not prescriptive rights or freedom, and like many other acts of depravity, are not consistent with social norms, practices, customs and mores. In a predominantly Christian society, not sure the ‘…suggestive advocacy’ can be reconciled with the Scriptures that speaks to ‘…abomination to God and death to two men cohabiting with each other for sexual gratification [Leviticus 20: 13].

Comments are closed.