Antigua and Barbuda welcomes lawsuit by former LIAT workers


Some 600 former LIAT employees are celebrating the news that they can now proceed with court action against the Antigua and Barbuda government on the eve of the second anniversary of their termination as they seek to get millions of dollars in financial entitlements they claim are owed them.

News of the breakthrough came on Thursday afternoon from Barbadian pilot Neil Cave, who, along with four of his colleagues had filed a suit in the Antigua High Court, challenging the constitutionality of Section 564(1)(a) of the Companies Amendment Act 2020.

That section of the act imposed an automatic stay of proceedings on all matters against LIAT 1974 Limited, which is currently under administration.

This resulted in a 2015 High Court claim by the pilots, which was set for trial in 2020, being adjourned indefinitely since LIAT had argued that because of section 564(1)(a), there was now an automatic stay of proceedings.

But this afternoon, High Court Judge Justice Marissa Robertson upheld the two key contentions of the pilots.

He ruled that the section of the Companies Act complained of was unconstitutional in that it is “over-broad” and not rationally connected with the objective of the amendment, which is to allow debtors (including LIAT) to pursue rehabilitation by affording it protection from enforcement by its creditors, and therefore cannot be justifiable.

The judge also ruled that the section also infringed the principle of separation of powers as the automatic stay of proceedings removed new and current matters from the oversight of the court.

Commenting on the outcome, Cave told Barbados TODAY: “It’s been a good day. A reward after two terrible years.”

Cave explained that the court challenge originated with a claim against the Antigua and Barbuda government regarding “unauthorised” lodging of their pensions with the collapsed CLICO International Life Insurance Company Limited.

“Initially we would have challenged the interpretation because when we went to court…and this would have been on another matter, a pension matter where we were contending that monies were illegally lodged in CLICO – when we went to court on the trial date, this Companies Amendment Act which had been passed a couple of months before, they said all matters are stayed. We could not even proceed in terms of the trial,” he stated.

“We thought that was very unfair. We challenged initially the interpretation with the good help of Ruggles Fergusson [pilots’ attorney]. We had a ruling go against us. The court said it had no power to decide on the interpretation…that they had to take the interpretation literally as Parliament had written it.”

The former senior LIAT pilot further explained that when that decision was taken to the Court of Appeal, it upheld the ruling of the court below.

“They said they could not listen to the constitutional side of it…we would have to go the constitutional route and then if it makes it back to the Court of Appeal then they would basically look at it. So we filed a constitutional motion to say that the Companies Amendment Act was unconstitutional in our view because it was simply too broad and it stopped us from having access to the court and a fair hearing to allow our matters to be determined,” Cave told Barbados TODAY.

He said that today’s judgment is a major win, not only for the pilots, but by extension, all terminated LIAT employees.

“It’s a huge victory for a handful of pilots. It gives all the LIAT employees at least the right to a fair hearing now and for us it’s a tremendous victory and it brings back a tremendous amount of confidence in the system,” he said.

Cave said having gone through years of bad news, today’s judgment has given him and his four colleagues a chance to have their day in court.

However, the ex-LIAT pilot lamented that during the entire “ordeal” of trying to fight the Antigua and Barbuda government through the courts, they did not get any backing from their union, the Leeward Islands Airline Pilots Association (LIALPA).

“It was only a handful of us. The LIALPA did not support us going forward. We weren’t given any help by the union, but we were successful,” he declared.

Earlier today before receiving news of the ruling, a group of the ex-LIAT Barbadian pilots updated Barbados TODAY on their latest situation, the day before the second anniversary of their dismissal from the St John’s-headquartered airline owned by shareholder governments Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, St Vincent and the Grenadines and Dominica.

One of the pilots, who did not want to be named, disclosed that they were informed that the $2,000 per month advance from the Barbados Government which the local former employees were receiving, has been discontinued from this month, two months short of the promised 12-month period.

“The last payment was already made this month. So we are in no-man’s land. People were expecting 12 months and then some further assistance to get the matter settled. But the employees were notified about two weeks ago now, that the tenth payment would be the last payment. So we are just awaiting further [word]. We are very much in the wilderness here,” he stated.

The four former LIAT pilots, including a female, who at times became highly emotional and close to tears spoke of having to beg and borrow money even from pensioners in order to make it through each day.

They spoke of being on the brink of homelessness as they counted down the days when the lending institutions could no longer “hold strain” while the arrears on their mortgages and other loans accumulated because of the non payment to the former workers of severance or any other entitlements.

The dismissed workers have been fighting since the airline’s collapse to get more than EC$120 million owed in severance and other benefits. The government has made several offers to cover at least 50 per cent of the severance and union officials have rejected each offer.

When contacted, president of LIALPA Patterson Thompson declined to comment and Minister of Tourism and International Transport Senator Lisa Cummins was unavailable up to late this evening.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]


  1. Justice Marissa Robertson is a “she” not “he”. Please don’t put her in the same boat like Comrade Washie 😂

  2. The already small pot now just got smaller for other workers (more persons to share with). The unions did not support this action because they at least understand a win here, takes some bread out of their members mouth

  3. Gaston you are wasting precious time with Liat 2020. Don’t bother with trying to save LIAT 1974. These former LIAT workers will not be grateful to you in the end. And you would have waste lots of money trying to keep Liat 1974 in the air. Draw the line now and take the hard decision. Start LIAT 2020 and liquidate the old LIAT 1974. Cut clean. It’s the best way.

  4. FROM THE SIDELINE it was a herculean task, if not impossible, for Antigua alone to have saved LIAT. Gaston Browne in his bombast believes that he can solve any problem, however, this one is way beyond him. By the way, what has become of all the investors waiting to invest in LIAT? BEEF I would like to hear an update on the operation of LIAT.

    • Just like Jolly Beach, no investor wants to put in money to pay debt that does not bring any value. And that is what severance pay is. Debt without corresponding value. The seller will have to swallow that debt. Therefore, the asking price would be the same as the severance. And you get nothing more.
      And by the way Charles, as you can see, I do not agree completely with Gaston on every issue. I’m a businessman, he is a politician. He cares about workers; I care about business.

  5. It look like there is no such thing as job security anymore. It died with VC Bird. Half Moon Bay workers, Stanford Development Firm workers and most recently Jolly Beach workers and LIAT workers. They need to pass a law that a company put aside a certain percentage for severances just in case they failed.

    • Job Security is a fallacy. It has long gone out the window. Only Public Servants still enjoy that. Just because of the stupid philosophy of the government at the time. No one wants to make the hard decision. To the detriment of the taxpayers. Someone has to pay the bill in the end. It’s all politically well to boast that you have not laid off a single worker, but at what cost.

Comments are closed.