105 new laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases in Antigua and Barbuda


(Dashboard Update for February 1, 2022)


The most recent report received by the Ministry of Health, Wellness and the Environment revealed one hundred and five (105) new laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases in Antigua and Barbuda as of Friday 28th January, 2022 at 6pm.


Two hundred and ninety-eight (298) samples were processed.


One hundred and ninety-four (194) recovered cases were recorded.


Consequently, the total number of persons with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases in Antigua and Barbuda is six thousand seven hundred and thirty-two (6,632); which is inclusive of two hundred and eighty-seven (287) active cases. There are nine (9) hospitalized cases; two (2) severe, one (1) moderate and six (6) mild.


The dashboard has been updated to reflect these changes.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]


  1. More BREAKING vaccinated news:

    Real Covid numbers from Australia’s largest state. 76% of DEATHS since mid-January are in the VACCINATED. Deaths in the boosted are also SOARING.

    Every day, the Australian state of New South Wales reports Covid deaths by age and vaccination status.


    In the last 15 days, 417 of the 552 people who died of Covid in New South Wales were VACCINATED, compared to 135 who were UNVACCINATED.

    Sixty of the vaccinated people who died had received the BOOSTER shot. these deaths skew markedly to the last few days. 49 of the 60 boosted people died in the last week – including the most recent, a man in his 30s who had no pre-existing conditions.

    Source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/news/pages/20220201_01.aspx

  2. This is a clear case of all the vaccinated people visiting my country spreading this Covid. Backstabbing Gaston Browne only letting in the vaccinated people. I hope the backstabbing bitch catch Covid himself and it do him in.

    Vote the stripper pole bus. No more backstabbing King Liad Gaston Browne.

  3. When Reuters says it, then it’s not misinformation. Mainstream is finally talking about Ivermectin. I would like to know if the Japanese used 🐎🐎🐎 in the trial… LMAO!

    All of us “anti science” people knows that Ivermectin has antiviral properties. Many countries have already used it to treat HUMANS with Covid19. Argentina, Brazil, El-Salvador, India, Mexico, Honduras and others have saved many lives with their Ivermectin kits.
    Maybe the rich countries should embrace it to stop the mass die off of the “good” vaxxed folks.


  4. Mask effectiveness – masks don’t protect you or others

    The CDC knows damn well that randomized trials are much more reliable than non-randomized trials. So when the randomized trials for cloth and surgical masks showed that they didn’t work, the CDC simply ignored those trials and focused on confounded studies that supported their belief system. This is deceptive and unethical and not a single member of the mainstream medical community has called them out on this.

    Cloth and surgical masks appear to be completely useless against COVID according to all the randomized trials done with COVID (Denmark and Bangladesh). None of the trials found a statistically significant effect.

    Note that the Denmark study was re-written so the journal would publish it. This is called making the science fit the narrative and is unethical. The Bangladesh study concluded masks work, but Yale and Stanford professors were caught with their pants down when UC Berkeley Professor Ben Recht showed their conclusions were wrong and that masks did nothing. We got the data ourselves and did an independent analysis and found that Recht was spot on. When I pointed out the error to the author of the article in Nature in an email on December 11, she ignored me. Science doesn’t matter. If your study supports the narrative it gets published and covered by the mainstream press. That’s the way it works today.

    At a minimum, since the high quality science clearly shows that cloth and surgical masks were useless for COVID, why weren’t people alerted to the fact that these interventions were false “security blankets” that never provided any actual protection?

    N95 and FFP2 masks, make absolutely no difference in real world studies (the graphs are identical to surgical masks). Indeed, extensive scientific literature establishes that wearing surgical masks and respirators (e.g., “N95”) does not reduce the risk of contracting a verified illness. Additionally, N95 masks are very hard to wear for long periods.

    The only mask that has the potential to significantly reduce your risk of COVID infection are P100 respirators. They are far superior than any of the options previously recommended by the CDC. They are roughly 150X more effective than a perfectly fitted N95 mask. This was well known, yet it wasn’t until nearly two years into the pandemic that the CDC finally mentioned P100 respirators in their masking guidance starting on September 10, 2021. Why didn’t the CDC wait so long before notifying the public to this more effective option earlier?

    Why haven’t we seen a single CDC official wearing a mask that actually provides adequate protection against COVID? Instead we see them wearing protection that quality scientific studies have proven makes absolutely no difference. They have jeopardized lives by promoting interventions that are nonsensical and not supported by randomized trials. What’s worse is they led people to believe the interventions worked. You can’t have it both ways. You cannot ignore 32 randomized trials that show that ivermectin works and still not recommended while at the same time you have zero randomized trials for cloth and surgical masks that show they work and mandate the wearing of such masks. How do you explain that?

Comments are closed.