
ROYAL POLICE FORCE OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
Office of Strategic Communications (STRATCOM)
MEDIA RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
POLICE INVESTIGATE FATAL TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ON SIR GEORGE WALTER HIGHWAY
St. John’s, Antigua and Barbuda — Sunday, 29 June 2025
The police are continuing investigations into a fatal traffic collision that occurred on Sir George Walter Highway in the vicinity of Romeo Plumbing.
The incident took place around 9:30 p.m. on Saturday, June 28, involving a white Toyota Vellfire minivan driven by a 40-year-old male of New Winthorpes, and a pedestrian, identified as 58-year-old Kendrick Hughes of Light Foot West.
The allegations are that the driver was travelling from south to north on Sir George Walter Highway, and upon passing a parked truck on the western side of the highway, the vehicle came in contact with the pedestrian.
Emergency Medical Services shortly arrived at the scene; however, the pedestrian succumbed to his injuries. He was pronounced dead at 10:46 p.m.
The Police Administration extends sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of the late Kendrick Hughes during this difficult time.
– END –
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
Have mercy Lord Jesus 🙏🏿
Lord JESUS too many death..
WHAT THE HELL…! …POLICE CONTINUING INVESTIGATION…? OR …CONDUCTING INVESTIGATION…?
***
THOUGH THE ‘…STRATCOM MEDIA RELEASE’ SPEAKS TO ‘…CONTINUING,’ LOOKS MORE LIKE ‘…CONDUCTING INVESTIGATION: in
(a) ‘…VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ACCIDENT THAT HAS REPORTEDLY SNUFFED OUT THE LIFE OF A WALKING ‘..PEDESTRIAN.’
***
INCIDENT v FATAL TRAFFIC ACCIDENT:
THE OCCURRENCE: is
(a) ‘…CLEARLY NOT AN INCIDENT’ [Paragraph 2]: but
(b) …A ‘…FATAL TRAFFIC ACCIDENT.’
***
DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES:
***
IT WAS TO PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE THAT IMPOTENCE AND/OR INCOMPETENCE WERE KNOWN TO HAVE DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES ON MANY INVESTIGATIONS: be it
(i) ‘…CONVENTIONAL CRIMES: and
(ii) …VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS.’
***
NOW:
SEE WHAT MIGHT BE MADE OF, OR DEDUCED FROM THESE:
***
(i) ‘…TWO MOTOR VEHICLES: and
(ii) …A PEDESTRIAN WERE REPORTEDLY ON THE ROADWAY:
***
(iii) …ONE VEHICLE REPORTEDLY PARKED/STOPPED ON LEFT SIDE OF ROADWAY:
***
(iv) …ONE VEHICLE IN MOTION TRAVELLING NORTHWARDS ON ROADWAY:
***
(v) …PEDESTRIAN WALKING ALONG ROADWAY: either
***
(vi) …WALKING NORTHWARD OR SOUTHWARD: and either
***
(a) …ON SIDE OF ROADWAY ‘…FACING ONCOMING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC: or
***
(b) …ON SIDE OF ROADWAY ‘…NOT FACING ONCOMING’ VEHICULAR TRAFFIC:
***
INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC:
WHICHEVER WAY THE ‘..PEDESTRIAN’ MAY HAVE BEEN WALKING, FROM THIS ‘…STRATCOM’ MEDIA RELEASE, ‘…INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC’ SUGGESTS THESE:
***
(i) ‘…PARKED/STOPPED MOTOR VEHICLE ON LEFT SIDE OF ROADWAY, NECESSITATED THE MOTOR VEHICLE IN MOTION: had
(ii) …VEERED OFF TO THE RIGHT TO AVOID CRASHING INTO THE ‘…REAR/FRONT’ OF PARKED/STOPPED MOTOR VEHICLE:
***
(iii) …THIS NECESSARILY MEANT:
(iv) …THE MOTORIST CROSSING ‘…DOUBLE NO OVERTAKING WHITE LINES (Iravelling northward):’ thereby
(v) …ENTERING/DRIVING IN ‘…SOUTHBOUND ONLY CENTER LANE:’
***
(vi) ….PEDESTRIAN COULD EITHER HAVE BEEN HIT: in
(a) ‘…THE CENTER LANE: or
***
(b) ‘…THE LEFT LANE.’ .
***
HORRIBLE: CREDIBLE SOURCE REVEALED: that
(i) ‘…FROM POINT OF IMPACT (PI), PEDESTRIAN WAS HEAVED A DISTANCE OF SOME ‘…75-80 FEET AWAY: and
(ii) ….DIED INSTANTLY: with
***
(iii) …AN EYE PLUCKED FROM ITS SOCKET.’
***
NUMB-SKULLED JURIES: …NO EXCUSES
EVEN AS SOME APPARENT ‘…NUMB-SKULLED JURIES’ MAY RETURN ‘…NOT GUILTY VERDICTS,’ THERE ARE ‘…NO EXCUSES FOR ANY MOTORIST TO SAY:
***
(i) ‘…STREETS HAD NO LIGHTS: or
(ii) …STREETS WERE POORLY LIT: and
(iii) …PEDESTRIAN/DECEASED WAS WEARING DARK CLOTHING.’
***
EXPECTATIONS:
DRIVERS ARE:
(a) ‘…EXPECTED TO.SEE CLEARLY AT NIGHTS: as they are
(b) …EXPECTED TO SEE WHEN DRIVING IN DAYLIGHT.’
***
WHAT THE HELL…!
***
MORE ONE READS: …MORE ONE LEARNS.’
***
WALK CAREFULLY: …DRIVE SAFELY: …LOOK OUT FOR PEDESTRIANS.’
***
Pompey relax. There was a procedural misunderstanding with the last similar case. There should be better instructions given to the jurors