The government of Antigua and Barbuda has expressed growing concern over the rising cases of stroke and heart failure, linking the alarming trend to unhealthy lifestyle choices.
During the post-cabinet press conference, Chief of Staff Lionel Max Hurst shared the government’s observations and outlined plans to address the issue through preventative healthcare campaigns.
“Too many of us have big dinners and go to bed without exercise or eat lots of fatty foods during the day,” Hurst explained, echoing concerns raised by health officials. The government emphasized that these lifestyle patterns, coupled with a lack of regular medical check-ups, are contributing significantly to the increase in life-threatening conditions like strokes and heart disease.
Health experts have also noted a disparity in healthcare-seeking behaviors between men and women.
“Men, in particular, are reluctant to visit doctors, even when they experience symptoms,” Hurst added, highlighting the need for targeted outreach to encourage men to take their health more seriously.
The government is ramping up efforts to promote healthier living, encouraging citizens to adopt better dietary habits, exercise regularly, and seek timely medical advice. It is also urging individuals with conditions such as high blood pressure to adhere strictly to prescribed medications to avoid complications.
This push for preventative care comes as the healthcare system faces an increasing burden.
More than 100 patients in Antigua and Barbuda are currently undergoing dialysis, a figure the government fears could rise if lifestyle changes are not adopted. While additional dialysis machines are being prepared for installation, officials stress that prevention is a more sustainable approach to addressing the growing health crisis.
The Ministry of Health has launched a nationwide public awareness campaign to educate residents about the dangers of poor eating habits, sugary drinks, and sedentary lifestyles.
The campaign also aims to equip citizens with practical tips for making healthier choices, such as portion control, avoiding processed foods, and incorporating physical activity into daily routines.
By promoting these preventative measures, the government hopes to reduce the prevalence of non-communicable diseases and ease the strain on healthcare services. This includes managing costs associated with treatment for strokes, heart conditions, and kidney disease.
Officials have underscored the need for collective action, urging families, workplaces, and community groups to support and encourage healthier lifestyles.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
VAX VAX VAX……THE BIGEST ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
Is this the same government that mandated the fauci ouchie which has been linked to blood clots and myocarditis etc? I’m asking for a friend of a friend of a friend…
Now!? They have gym trainers and fit men catching stroke with no prior health problems so please wheel and come again. JOKES!
People eating bad for centuries stop playing diet and address the real problem
Check the facts it’s the Vax!
It’s sad what they mandated and now alot of people are suffering .
…cause, and effect!
I, recently took in The Kings Of Tupelo and the Jamie Foxx Special on NETFLIX, and in many ways, both productions were dealing with #Conspiracy_Theory’s.
Reading this article, and reading the comments thus far, from HUEmans and not AI_Bots, I hope; the majority is throwing darts at Vaccines.
The reason why I mentioned those two(2) NETFLIX productions and viewing them [now], at this Moment In Time and the time I took Mrs. Kentish History classes at AGS & AGHS, in the 1970’s, took the GCE Exam at 16 years old, and got a B, I can honestly say, CONSPIRACIES do have a way, of driving HUEmans to believe, behave and behold, in untold manners.
If, the People of Antigua & Barbuda feels as strongly, as the comments are suggesting (re): the vaccines which were mandated during the COVID pandemic and lockdown are somehow responsible, for the increase in these health issues, in the Nation, I would think, that this is a non-political issue, since (without stats/info), those affected are not being affected because of political colors nor persuasions.
This means, there should be a RALLYING CRY, by ALL, to force the government to be more forthcoming with information, as to possible [causes] which are AFFECTING more people than normal.
This is a GREAT cause, to be taken up by any MEMBER of the Parliament, and garner BI-PARTISAN support.
Personally, neither the vaccines (didn’t take any – many who were blogging here during the lockdown, would’ve read my recommendations for immunity to the virus: Melchesidec, ah wah u a say); and, yes during the unslaught, unleashing of the virus on HUEmanity, I did test positive for the virus during a 72hour period. Flu like symptoms, runny nose, no fever, no headache, the body kicked it (the virus) out after using just enough, of it to inoculate itself.
I’ve been under the surgeons knives for two(2) total knee replacement surgery. Damn skippy, I chant Ras Tafar I, not RASSISHNESS, about everything is BABYLON; so, I got two(2) titanium bionic knees, didn’t have to take no VACCINES, even though my surgery’s came during and after the pandemic.
I used myself, and my experience(s) with the vaccines, conspiracies during the last 65 years and beyond because, I think, that the People of Antigua & Barbuda who were forced and mandated, to take these vaccines, with knowledge of similar side affects that are causing the rapid increase in heart and other pulmonary issues, the PEOPLE deserve explanations of the reasons, possible reasons, in plain and simple everyday, layman, street language.
These soundbites and headlines of what is transpiring are not doing those affected, the most, proper justice.
Which vaccine brand, did the PM, his Cabinet and some of the Nation’s elitist took, versus those which they even TEAR-GASSED, others into taking?
CTV and CARRIBEAN CINEMAS, HAMA and ANTIGUA FILM INDUSTRY, where are your DOCUSERIES and LOCAL PRODUCTIONS?
Such great stories to tell…
#the ALFA_NARGO
#UNDAH_BRIDGE
#JAM_DUNG & DE_ASOT SAGA with CHERRIE de PROMOTER.
Ras Smood aka Jumbee_Picknee
De’Ole Dutty Peg🦉Garrat_Bastard
Vere C. Edwards
Continue with the vaccine story. But a lot of the people with stroke and heart disease did not take the vaccine. For example, Megatron the poster boy for non-vaccination recently had a stroke.
Years of KFC, pork and rice pudding, white bread, soft drink, alcohol, smoking and party life catching up to Antigua. Looking at the age group that id dying most. Then check the lifestyle of the people born pre 1950 and post 1950.
You can thank me in the morning.
Your argument also opens the door to a broader discussion on humanity’s historical tendency to create narratives and explanations for phenomena they do not yet understand. This tendency reflects our deep desire for meaning and certainty in a complex and often chaotic world.
The Creation of God and Misunderstanding the Universe
Human Need for Explanation: Historically, humans have created gods and myths to explain the mysteries of the natural world. Before science provided answers, phenomena like thunder, eclipses, or disease were attributed to divine or supernatural forces. The creation of gods served as a way to fill gaps in knowledge, offering comfort and a sense of control in an unpredictable universe. In this context, the idea of “man creating God” was less about divine revelation and more about humanity grappling with its ignorance.
Misplaced Certainties: Just as ancient civilizations believed the Earth was the center of the universe—a belief rooted in observation but disproven by science—modern society often clings to ideas that feel intuitively correct but lack empirical support. The backlash against vaccines or the embrace of conspiracy theories reflects a similar dynamic: when people don’t understand complex processes, they create their own explanations, often shaped by fear, bias, or cultural narratives.
Progress Through Science: The scientific revolution challenged many deeply held beliefs, showing us that the Earth is not the center of the universe and that natural phenomena have natural explanations. Vaccines, for example, are a triumph of this scientific progress, developed through centuries of research and understanding of biology, chemistry, and epidemiology. Yet, the rejection of vaccines by some reflects a resistance to this progress—a clinging to outdated or oversimplified narratives when the answers are more complex.
The Danger of Falling Into Old Patterns
When we fail to understand the mechanisms behind the universe—or in this case, public health and vaccines—we risk repeating the same errors of the past. Just as early societies attributed plagues to divine punishment, some today attribute health issues to malicious conspiracies without sufficient evidence. Both reflect a failure to engage with the available knowledge.
Bridging the Divide
Embracing Uncertainty: Humanity’s greatest progress comes from admitting what we don’t know and seeking to learn more. Instead of filling gaps in understanding with myths or conspiracies, we should encourage curiosity and critical thinking.
Learning from History: The story of humanity moving from “Earth as the center of the universe” to understanding the vastness of space shows our capacity to evolve in our thinking. We must apply this same willingness to learn and adapt when addressing contemporary issues like vaccines or public health.
A Unified Approach: Recognizing our shared ignorance in some areas should be a rallying point for unity, not division. Instead of creating adversarial narratives, societies should focus on education, transparency, and collaboration to navigate uncertainties together.
In the end, acknowledging that humans created gods or myths to explain the unknown should inspire humility and a commitment to pursuing truth through evidence and inquiry. Just as we overcame misconceptions about the universe, we can overcome the misunderstandings that fuel mistrust in science and society today. The key is to remain open-minded and committed to learning, rather than retreating into the comfort of outdated narratives.
@Steve, Two things can be true at the same time. Just because humans sometimes attribute things they don’t understand to a God does not mean that there has never been divine revelation. Also, science has not yet proven that the Earth is not the “center” meaning most important thing in the Universe. No other planet has yet been proven to have life. For all intents and purposes, the rest of the universe could just be looked at as space debris. Is a planet made of gas really a planet? You said a whole bunch of words but Science has not proven the absence of a Creator who was in existence before our universe. How could it ever prove that? You essentially want persons to put their faith in science and follow it/you blindly. If you say science says it then people should follow you right? Human beings can twist anything to suit their own agendas so if persons prefer to follow a benevolent God who they believe has their best interests at heart, there’s nothing wrong with that.
The Real Culprits: Diet, Lifestyle, and Scientific Inquiry
The Conspiracy Trap: Conspiracy theories thrive because they provide easy answers to complex issues, but they distract from real, actionable solutions. In Antigua and Barbuda, blaming vaccines for the rise in health issues like strokes may feel intuitive but lacks scientific support. This mindset ignores other, more likely causes, such as diet, lifestyle changes, and environmental factors. It’s time for us to shift focus from conjecture to evidence.
Diet and Health: A Closer Look: A significant factor contributing to the rise in strokes and other health problems is the dramatic shift in dietary habits over the years. Historically, Antiguans relied on local, fresh foods like ground provisions, fish, and seasonal fruits. However, with the proliferation of fast-food chains and highly processed, imported foods, diets have become richer in unhealthy fats, sodium, and sugar.
Before Fast Food: Studies could explore the prevalence of strokes and other health conditions before the arrival of fast-food outlets in Antigua.
After Fast Food: Comparing current health statistics with historical data could highlight how diet has shifted over time and its direct correlation with the rise in health issues.
This isn’t just speculation; the connection between poor diet and conditions like hypertension, obesity, and diabetes is well-documented in medical literature. All of these are major risk factors for strokes.
Scientific Inquiry and Public Health: Instead of chasing unproven conspiracies about vaccines, Antiguans could demand a national study into the relationship between dietary habits and health outcomes. Such research could:
Examine how the introduction of fast-food chains has influenced eating habits.
Analyze the consumption of processed foods, sugary drinks, and their contribution to rising rates of obesity and heart disease.
Explore public health campaigns to encourage a return to healthier, traditional diets.
Personal Responsibility: While systemic changes are necessary, individuals also have a role to play. Antiguans must critically evaluate their eating habits and prioritize healthier choices. Returning to traditional foods, reducing processed food intake, and embracing regular physical activity can have a profound impact on overall health.
Moving Forward: A Healthier Antigua
Education Over Speculation: Misinformation and conspiracy theories will not solve Antigua’s public health challenges. A nationwide effort to educate citizens on the impact of diet and lifestyle on health could drive real change.
Government Responsibility: Policymakers should invest in public health campaigns, impose stricter regulations on fast food, and promote locally sourced, nutritious options.
Community Action: Communities can organize initiatives like cooking classes, fitness programs, and health screenings to empower individuals to make informed choices.
The rise in strokes and other health problems is not a mystery. It is a consequence of lifestyle changes, particularly dietary habits, over the years. By focusing on scientifically supported causes—like the shift from traditional foods to fast food and processed meals—Antiguans can address the real issues affecting public health. It’s time to put conspiracy theories aside and take control of our health through education, evidence, and action.
@Steve Calling something a conspiracy theory without adequate studies is unscientific. There was in fact a recent pandemic and a new type of vaccine was used. Some persons feel that they have observed an increase in sudden deaths afterwards. It is not unreasonable to question whether a correlation exists. However, there have also been other recent historical events such as wars and inflation that affect persons’ stress levels and dietary habits, and pandemic related stress and life adjustments could also still have an impact on persons’ lives. So, if persons feel there’s a recent increase all factors as well as those you outlined should be studied to best guide decision making. So, why not just conduct some studies on all possible factors including vaccine-related ones and get to the truth of the matter? Whatever the cause, eating healthier etc. of course should help.
@Steve In other words, people should return to eating God’s food as provided in nature and stop eating scientifically processed junk masquerading as food lol. Let’s be honest, science had done a lot of good in the food industry but also a lot of bad…
We have got to start eating healthier but it is near impossible when you see the prices in the supermarkets especially the one in Woods (too big to fail) last week Friday I bought a whole chicken 4.9 lbs for $32 this Saturday one that is 4.2lbs is $51 how is that possible so the stress plus the unhealthy foods is part of the problem
If the government of A&B genuinely care about its citizens, they cannot continue to bury their heads in the sand and ignore the probability of jabs (particularly mRNA’s) role in the increases of strokes and heart failures. This has become a pattern with all of the leaders of the highly jabbed nations – pretend everything is normal.
In order to mitigate further increases, ALL probable causes must be ruled out. There are blood test that can detect the level of spike protein in the blood; mRnA recipients should be advised on the alternative methods that have shown to be helpful in ameliorating damages from spike.
This is a huge problem that will be ongoing for quite some time — if we reduce it to ONLY a diet and lifestyle issue we’ll never solve it.
https://www.youtube.com/live/1UHoiePQPLE?si=NgguFIpDkbfq2kln
https://www.youtube.com/live/1UHoiePQPLE?si=NgguFIpDkbfq2kln
https://youtu.be/_K8vIMUZZ4U?si=g6XROnHI4HUz_6VQ
@sure – Your response touches on some deep philosophical and scientific questions, and it’s important to approach this respectfully and thoughtfully. While I respect the belief in divine revelation and the value it holds for many, let’s examine some of the points you’ve raised through the lens of both history and logic.
Two Truths at Once?
You’re absolutely correct that humans can hold multiple truths or perspectives simultaneously. However, the distinction between what we “know” through empirical evidence and what we “believe” based on faith is critical. Historically, humans have often filled gaps in understanding with divine explanations.
For example: Lightning was once attributed to Zeus or Thor. Diseases were thought to be punishments from God before germ theory was developed. This isn’t to say divine revelation isn’t possible, but it does highlight our pattern of invoking the divine when we lack understanding.
The Earth and the Universe
Science has indeed shown that Earth is not the physical center of the universe—this was proven by Copernicus, Galileo, and others through observable evidence. The idea that Earth could be the “most important” or “spiritually significant” part of the universe is a philosophical stance, not a scientific one. While life as we know it hasn’t been found elsewhere, the absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence. Science operates on the principle of continuing to search, question, and learn rather than making definitive claims about the unknown.
Faith in Science vs. Faith in God
You argue that science hasn’t proven the absence of a Creator, and you’re absolutely right—it hasn’t. But it’s important to understand that science doesn’t operate to disprove or prove God; science is a method for understanding the natural world. Faith, on the other hand, is about personal belief. The two serve different purposes:
Science asks “how” and provides explanations that can be tested and revised. Faith often asks “why” and offers meaning, which doesn’t require empirical validation. Expecting science to prove or disprove a Creator misunderstands its purpose. It’s not about blind faith in science but about valuing evidence, reason, and the iterative process of learning.
Trusting Science and Human Bias
You mentioned that human beings twist anything to suit their agendas, and that’s true of both science and religion. However:
Science has built-in mechanisms to correct bias: peer review, replication, and falsifiability. This doesn’t make it perfect, but it strives for self-correction. Faith relies on interpretation, which can vary widely and is more subjective. Encouraging people to trust science isn’t about blind obedience. It’s about valuing a process that has demonstrably improved our understanding of the world and our quality of life—vaccines, technology, and medical advancements are all testaments to this.
Benevolent God vs. Evidence-Based Action
There’s nothing inherently wrong with following a benevolent God, especially if that belief leads to kindness and community. However, when faith-based beliefs clash with evidence-based solutions—such as in public health crises like COVID-19—it’s worth questioning how to balance personal belief with collective responsibility.
Final Thoughts
Faith and science don’t have to be in conflict, but they must be understood in context. One seeks understanding through evidence; the other seeks meaning through belief. The problem arises when people use faith to reject evidence outright or when scientific inquiry is seen as a threat to spiritual beliefs. Both can coexist if we allow room for curiosity, critical thinking, and respect for differing perspectives. The goal isn’t to “blindly follow” anything—it’s to think critically and make informed choices for the betterment of all.
I agree both faith and science can coexist peacefully. Both serve different purposes. The purpose of science is not to prove or disprove God’s existence. And religion does not exist to provide a full scientific explanation of the laws of nature. Not questioning science turns it into a religion, which is why respect for differing interpretations and engaging in dialogue to get to the truth (instead of trying to hush dissenters) is critical.
Also important to mention that science without religion is not inherently virtuous. Science can be used for both ‘good’ and ‘evil’. Without moral/religious oversight there is no guarantee that scientific discoveries would be used for the good of the majority of humanity. So, both are important.
@ Sure – Your response is thoughtful and acknowledges the complexity of the situation, which is important. However, let’s examine a few key points in the context of the ongoing discussion about correlation, causation, and public health.
Questioning Correlation vs. Causation
You are right that questioning whether a correlation exists is not inherently unreasonable—scientific inquiry thrives on questions. However, it’s crucial to approach these questions with rigor and caution:
Correlation Does Not Equal Causation: Just because two events occur around the same time (e.g., vaccine rollout and perceived health changes) doesn’t mean one caused the other. For instance, people often forget that the pandemic itself—and the virus—had significant effects on health, including increased risks of blood clots, heart issues, and strokes.
Anecdotal Observations: Many claims of “increased sudden deaths” are based on anecdotal evidence, which can be misleading. Humans are prone to noticing patterns and assigning meaning, even when the evidence is incomplete or coincidental.
Why Focus on Broader Studies?
The suggestion to study “all possible factors” is valid, but it’s worth noting that such studies are and were already underway (COVID 1……19):
Ongoing Vaccine Monitoring: Vaccines are subject to continuous monitoring by organizations like the CDC, WHO, and independent researchers. Adverse effects are tracked, and the data overwhelmingly shows that vaccines are safe and effective for the vast majority of people.
Stress, Diet, and Lifestyle Factors: As you pointed out, stress, dietary habits, and life changes during the pandemic are also significant contributors to health issues. These are well-documented in public health studies and should absolutely be part of the conversation.
Scientific Prioritization: Resources for research are not infinite. Public health agencies must prioritize studies based on the strength of existing evidence. At this point, the data does not suggest a widespread causal link between vaccines and sudden deaths, which is why studies are focused more on known risk factors like the long-term effects of COVID-19 itself, mental health, and socioeconomic stressors.
The Role of Public Communication (Trust)
One of the biggest challenges in these discussions is the spread of misinformation. Labeling something a conspiracy theory isn’t meant to dismiss valid questions but to highlight when speculation lacks a solid foundation. Public health discourse must balance encouraging curiosity and inquiry while discouraging the spread of unsupported claims that can erode trust in proven interventions, like vaccines.
@Steve I agree with many things that you say. However, recognizing patterns is ironically used as an IQ test among us humans, the greater the ability to see or work out complex patterns, the greater the intelligence, so we say. So, people seeing “patterns” is not inherently a bad thing. E.g. the many athletes who reportedly dropped on the field shortly after the pandemic – there was a notable increase in such reports. Persons could not be sure whether those were due to the vaccine, post-viral infection causes or increased reporting of normal phenomena among athletes. Since no studies were carried out, unease in the public would persist. Also, when public health authorities choose to employ a strategy of trying to discredit or shame persons with genuine concerns instead of responding factually even with a “we don’t know yet but we believe…”, that erodes public trust in their health agenda. Finally, like it or not, one set of persons cannot dictate for the rest of humanity what should be done in every instance in an emergency. Even if the vaccines were perfect, people had the right to refuse them if they wanted to. That’s why proper studies and data are important if you really want to convince the vast majority of persons to go along with you. Most people don’t refuse traditional vaccines because they are satisfied with the proof that they work. The proof supporting these new vaccines was/is a lot shakier. Even if health agencies have concluded that the benefits outweighed the risks, the public was not all convinced and probably won’t be until more time has elapsed. Considering that many persons could survive the disease just fine without the shot and that persons who succumbed had many other comorbidities and that there were other strategies available to reduce deaths meant that it was not unreasonable for persons to feel that they should not be forced to take it. It could have just been made available for those most at risk. Trying to force the issue also eroded trust. The public trust in health agencies has also deteriorated because of refusal to carry out studies just because the results might prove embarrassing. The excuse that the majority of persons would reject all other vaccines because of concerns of that one is unfounded. So, personally, I believe health agencies should focus on honestly finding the root causes of problems and engage respectfully with the public instead of trying to shame members of the public into submission.
@sooo – You’re absolutely right that returning to natural, whole foods can greatly benefit health. A diet rich in fresh fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins—”God’s food” as you call it—provides the nutrients our bodies need to thrive. The overconsumption of highly processed, calorie-dense, nutrient-poor foods has indeed contributed to many modern health issues like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.
That said, while science has been responsible for some questionable innovations in the food industry (like ultra-processed junk), it has also brought significant benefits. For example:
Food Preservation: Advances in freezing, canning, and packaging have reduced food waste and made it possible to store and transport fresh produce across the globe.
Nutritional Fortification: Adding essential vitamins and minerals to foods, like iodine in salt or folic acid in bread, has helped eliminate deficiencies and improve public health.
Safer Food Supply: Scientific advances in food safety and quality control have drastically reduced the prevalence of foodborne illnesses.
The challenge is finding balance—using science to enhance access to nutritious food while rejecting harmful, overly processed options. Encouraging a return to natural eating habits is a great start, but let’s also leverage the best of science to support healthier lifestyles for everyone. It’s not an either-or; it’s about making informed choices.
A question, do you use charcoal or natural gas?
@Steve Neither really. Just the usual products from the petroleum industry available here. If your point is that science is useful, I don’t disagree. My point is what you eventually stated that balance is needed in determining where and how to make use of scientific discoveries. One cannot simply assume that every discovery or application is perfect. Many are but let’s not just worship blindly at the altar of “science”.
@Steve I have a question for you: Are your essay responses generated by AI? Because they sound very generic tbh…
over 60% of the population are overweight, eating habits are horrible, from oily low grade fatty foods to over sugar “fresh” juices, i am not surprised at all that we have the highest diabetes rates and cardio vascular deseases…. you don’t need a vaccine to get sick lol
Why the innoculators are so upset and defensive if someone believes it’s vax cause the problem, I believe they are scared 😱 so they are trying to comfort their minds and telling themselves is not the vax although deep in their Heart and mind it is
Blame the game not the players!
For those with short memories, in 2020, we had a choice – die from respiratory distress due to acute infection or die from something else 7yrs later (longcovid, vaxx side effects, the fallout from being in lockdown or not getting checkedup) . We chose.
Blame whomever created the WUHAN STAIN OF CORONA VIRUS!!!!
@ Steve, Sure, Sooo, et al…I can appreciate, reasonings like this; even though, it might be mind boggling for some, it’s food for thought and enlightenment to others.
…#fait!
…#au_fait!
…#fate🔄faith!
…Faith collides with Fate!?
…ne’r, the Twain Shall Meet!?
1…the ESSENCE, of Nature’s ether dictates, that the balance which HUEmanity seeks is directly correlated, to the symbiotic relationship of its [nature] own flora and fauna.
2…to this day, and please correct if I’m [wrong]; there are two(2) ways to solve a problem. Either by the SCIENTIFIC or Trial & Error Methods.
3…Whether, we accept or not, #Conspiracy Theories (the now buzz term used, to describe any and all thought processes outside, of the #proverbial_box which HUEmans are molded by -Culture) are no different, than THEORY’S, hypotheses which over time may or may not be proven, by way of TESTING the hypothesis and EVALUATE the results. Fear usually prejudices the EXPECTATIONS and EXPLANATIONS. While ‘fear’ can be a deterrent, it can also be a driving force…The Power Of Fear!
4…regarding this HEALTH ISSUE, there are more questions than answers; and, regardless of which side of the coin which you support, be mindful, a coin has THREE(3) sides, not the two(2) which many are led/taught to believe in.
Belief is similar to fear. It can stagnate, as well as enlighten.
Ras Smood aka Jumbee_Picknee
De’Ole Dutty Peg🦉Garrat_Bastard
Vere C. Edwards
@Ras Smood Your writings are always interesting and enlightening as well. True, any theory could eventually be accepted if the proof eventually becomes available. So, it’s best to be respectful in disagreements in situations where studies and proofs are still being worked on. Definitely don’t muzzle people, just respectfully disagree when needed.
@soo – This is what writing looks like without emotions. The answer is no.
Alright, Steve, thanks for the responses. I am impressed with your organized replies although I both agree and disagree with various points. I can’t be bothered to write quite as formally online. I have heard many of those points before around the web. So, that’s what brought AI to mind. They are often unchallenged, although in my opinion some of those points are flawed. Ultimately I believe it’s important to preserve freedom of speech and to avoid putting a muzzle on people. The truth can stand on its own against unjustified attacks. Science should also be able to stand on its own without denigrating religion if it is backed by proper data and promoting something truly beneficial to people. Thanks for the generally respectful engagement.
Comments are closed.