Former Police Commissioner Rawlston Pompey has raised concerns about the handling of the case surrounding the death of 9-year-old Chantel Crump, warning that delays and evidentiary gaps could jeopardize the prosecution.
In a lengthy public comment on the Antigua Newsroom blog, Pompey reacted to discussion about the matter and the possibility of it being struck out for want of prosecution — a legal term used when the prosecution fails to properly advance a case.
The case has not been dismissed.
Pompey, writing from what he described as a “professional perspective,” argued that charging a suspect before key forensic steps are completed can undermine a case. He said investigators should ensure that post-mortem examinations are conducted and that pathologists determine the cause of death before proceeding with serious charges such as murder.
He outlined what he described as the proper investigative sequence: establishing reasonable grounds for suspicion, gathering corroborating evidence, allowing the pathologist’s findings to be reviewed, and enabling the Director of Public Prosecutions to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to committal proceedings and ultimately trial by judge and jury.
Pompey suggested that haste, investigative shortcomings or public pressure can compromise cases. He warned that the criminal justice system must not be perceived as failing the victim’s family, the accused’s family or society at large.
Referring to the separate Vincia James matter, which collapsed at trial after a “no case submission” was upheld, Pompey described that prosecution as a “comedy of a trial” and cited it as an example of what can happen when charges are brought without sufficient evidence.
In the Crump case, Pompey acknowledged that the child’s body was recovered and that a post-mortem was conducted, but he noted that the reported findings on the cause of death were inconclusive. He questioned whether the file remains with the Director of Public Prosecutions and whether sufficient evidence exists to support committal proceedings.
He concluded by cautioning that prolonged evidence-gathering — medical or otherwise — can weaken prosecutions and erode public confidence in the justice system.
The matter remains before the courts.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
I would definitely blame the DPP for that one, should that case be thrown out. Before charges are laid, especially serious offences, the DPP has to give directives ok n regards to what charges are to brought again an accused person. The police follow those kinds instructions. The forensic department (especially) needs it’s own space, proper tools and a special vehicle for forensic usage only. The Antigua and Barbuda Police Service is on a strain in j terms of fighting crime . Proper vehicles, man power, overworked, investigators have to be on parades, some have their little sidelines ( to assist in maintaining their way of life, etc). Serious Crimes Dept and CID need at least 6 decent vehicles to respond to reports in ample time. Crime fighting is a task and the good men and women in those areas, need to left alone to do just that. Continue training in crime fighting is of utmost importance. Public awareness and public trust are paramount as well in solving crimes.
At least somebody can understand what Pompey writes