Prosecutors in the Nigel Christian murder trial turned to cellphone tracking evidence Tuesday, calling an FBI expert to map the movements of the accused on the day the customs officer was abducted and killed.
Christian, 44, was taken from his McKinnons home on July 10, 2020, and later found shot in Thibou’s. Lasean Bully, Wayne Thomas and Saleim Harrigan have pleaded not guilty.
The FBI agent, qualified in historical cellphone analysis, told the court that by reviewing call records and tower data, investigators can estimate where a phone was when calls were made or received. He analyzed records for Harrigan and a cooperating witness who said he drove the men that day.
The data placed both phones in the Cashew Hill area shortly before 3 p.m., then later near Christian’s home and along Friars Hill Road and Dickinson Bay. Subsequent pings tracked movement toward the area where the victim’s vehicle was found, with later activity recorded in Holberton and Gray Hill.
Harrigan’s phone showed a similar pattern of movement across several towers during the afternoon and evening, and the expert said all contact between the two men that day was initiated by Harrigan.
Under questioning from the defense, the agent accepted that phones can occasionally connect to more distant towers, though he described that as unusual.
The digital evidence aligns with earlier testimony from the cooperating witness, who outlined a series of stops before Christian was forcibly removed from his home.
The matter continues before Justice Rajiv Persaud, with the prosecution expected to call dozens more witnesses.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
Now track whose phones they were in contact with over a period of say fifteen days prior to the abduction and murder to get to those who may have ordered, the alleged hit on Christian.
The same should be done for Asot Michael and Chantel Crump murders.
Let the experts loose on the Antigua crime syndicate.
Telephone thing mash up life…..Boss they Crown suspiciously going very far to make sure these guys get the maximum…I’m very curious to hear what Mr. Alexander, Bowen and Archibald can pull out of a top hat…..
If the FBI were approached to assist in Asot Michael’s murder, it will have to be a clandestine move because some people will hightail it out of Antigua but it’s not possible because those are the same ones who will have to make the request.
I am thinking with this type of expert witness we should be able to find out who is the scumbag that ordered the hit on Mr. Christian unless it’s in the interest of certain people not to know because at certain time one or all three had to have a conversation by phone eith this person. Criminals always make errors
WHAT THE HELL…! …JUDICIAL RIOT ACT: …NEWS PORTALS AND REPORTERS SUMMONED
TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE: …CONTEMPT OF COURT:
***
EXPERT EVIDENCE:
Darn lucky getting to read this ‘…TRIAL UP-DATE’ on the ‘…EXPERT’S EVIDENCE’ (Scientific).
Quite good.
***
COOPERATING WITHESS: …WHAT THE HELL…!
***
In criminal trials, and from an evidentiary perspective, there is no such term: as as
(a) ‘…COOPERATING WITNESS: one may hear
***
(b) …HOSTILE WITNESS.’
***
This is a ‘WITNESS’ who is called either by
(i) ‘…THE PROSECUTION: or
(ii) …THE DEFENCE BECOMING HOSTILE: by
(iii) …GIVING (Cut-throat) EVIDENCE TO THE PARTY: who
(iv) …NEVER CALLED HIM/HER TO THE ‘…WITNESS STAND.’
***
‘…THIS PROSECUTION ‘…COOPERATING WITNESS:’ and
(a) ‘…THAT REPORTED IN THE NEWS, CROWN PROSECUTORS: may likely to
(a) …ENCOUNTER SERIOUS DIFFICULTIES AT TWO STAGES:
(i) ‘ …RIGID CROSS EXAMINATION (of Evidence in Chief): and
(ii) …RE-EXAMINATION (After Cross Examination).’
***
It has been the professional knowledge that several had be slapped with the serious criminal offence of ‘…PERJURY’ (Falsely giving evidence on Oath).
***
WHAT THE HELL…!
***
ALL IS WELL, THAT ENDS WELL.
***
SUMMONED TO COURT:
Instructively, when several: ‘…LOCAL NEWS PORTALS:’
(a) ‘…OWNERS:
(b) …EDITORS: and
(c) …REPORTERS:’ were
(i) ‘…REPORTEDLY CHAMBER-SUMMONED: before
(ii) …TRIAL JUDGE, HIS LORDSHIP, JUSTICE RAJIV PERSAUD: he
(iii) …MAY HAVE READ THE ‘…JUDICIAL RIOT ACT: regarding
(iv) …THEIR APPARENT ‘…FIRST WITNESS’ GRAPHIC REPORTING ON THE ‘…NIGEL CHRISTIAN MURDER TRIAL.’
***
Such from professional knowledge and experience, has always been:
(a) …TRIAL JUDGES RESPONSIBILITY: as
(b) …IT AFFECTS UNBIASED AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL FOR ALL ACCUSED PERSONS:
(c) …SUCH ENSURES THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION: and
(d) …EQUITABLE DISPENSATION OF JUSTICE.’
***
It was not clear whether or not, which party to the proceedings:
(i) ‘…THE PROSECUTION: or
(ii) …THE DEFENCE MAY HAVE APRISED THE COURT OF THE ‘IST PROSECUTION WITNESS:
(a) …EVIDENCE, AS REPORTED IN THE LOCAL NEWS PORTALS: to
(b) …THE COURT’S ATTENTION: but
(c) …THE LEARNED JUSTICE, CORRECTLY TOOK ‘…JUDICIAL NOTICE;’ and
(d) …ACCORDINGLY, ACTED JUDICIALLY AND APPROPRIATELY.’
***
FEARING CONSEQUENCES FOR ‘…CONTEMPT OF COURT,’ THOSE: so
(e) …REPORTEDLY SUMMONED, GOVERNED THEMSELVES ACCORDINGLY.’
***
WHAT THE HELL…!
***
They have all avoided a ‘…Short Custodial Sojournment.’
***
TAKE WARNING.
***
What the hell is this? This is a new one in the Wadadli court room. I guess we can apply this to Chantel case, by matching the accused phone, and her male friends phone, tracking them both on the day of Channel murder, you may also apply it to Asot phone and his accused murderer phone on that specific day.
Comments are closed.