Ex-Police Officer Karim Warner to Serve Sentence at Former US Military Base Instead of HMP

23

Convicted Police Officer to Serve Sentence at Military Compound Instead of Prison

A convicted police officer in Antigua and Barbuda will serve his one-year jail term at a former U.S. military base instead of the country’s main prison, a move that has raised questions about preferential treatment for law enforcement officials.

An official prison notice confirmed that Officials ordered Officer Karim Warner, who pleaded NOT guilty to recklessly discharging his firearm in public, to be housed at the former U.S. Air Force Base in Coolidge. The facility has been declared an annex of Her Majesty’s Prison, according to the document.

Warner will be placed in room room on one of the blocks on the compound, under strict rules including constant supervision when outside his cell, restricted movements, and no civilian visits without approval.

Warner’s reassignment means he will not face the same conditions as other inmates at the island’s only prison, intensifying public debate over fairness and justice in the nation’s correctional system.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

23 COMMENTS

  1. Well….if the Scotland Yard RAPIST can get “good treatment”…..

  2. An ex police going into 1735 puts a target on him y’all need to stop it …..up at the base has a jail for when the soldiers misbehave.

  3. I am just stunned at the different kinds and levels of accommodation offered to prisoners. There is the good ole crappy 1735 and the upscale Air B&B at Coolidge. Some are fortunate, others are not so fortunate.

  4. WHAT THE HELL…! …PLEADED GUILTY…? …WHEN ANR? …WRONG LIKE HELL

    ***

    The information contained in ‘…Paragraph 2’ regarding ‘…PLEADING GUILTY,’ emphatically, is wrong like hell, ‘ANR.’

    ***
    When a ‘…Defendant’ is ‘…FOUND GUILTY’ by any ‘…COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION,’ was when:

    (a) ‘…HE/SHE HAD PLEADED ‘…NOT GUILTY: and

    (b) …FORCED THE COURT TO CONDUCT A FULL TRIAL:

    (c) …SUCH HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RIGHT OF ‘…ALL ACCUSED PERSONS.’

    ***

    WHY?: BURDEN OF PROOF

    (i) ‘…THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS A JUDICIAL DUTY PLACED UPON THE PROSECUTION:

    (ii) …THE PROSECUTION ‘…ACCUSED:’ and thus

    (iii) …THEY MUST PROVE THE GUILT OF THOSE SO ACCUSED:

    (iv) …IN PROVING GUILT, THE PROSECUTION SHALL DO SO ‘…BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.’
    ***

    NOTA BENE: (NB)

    THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A ‘…LEGAL DUTY’ PLACED ON ANY ACCUSED PERSON TO PROVE HIS/HER INNOCENCE’ [CO: 1981: Section 15].

    ***

    THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR MY ‘…SOCIAL MEDIA FRIEND, DR. DAVE RAY.’

    ***
    SUCH MIGHT HELP TO HALT HIS ‘…WANING RESPECT,’ FOR THIS COMMENTER.’

    ***

    EVEN SO, ‘…WHAT THE HELL…!

    ***

    BLESSED SATURDAY TO ALL A SUNDRY.

    ***

  5. WHAT THE HELL…! …PRISONER’S SAFETY: …RESPONSIBILITY OF PRISON AUTHORITY:

    ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG:

    ***
    Commenters shall see this course of action by ‘…PRISON AUTHORITY,’ as being as ‘…ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.’

    ***
    (i) ‘..THIS WAS A CALLING OF THE ‘…PRISON SUPERINTENDENT, LIEUTENANT KLONDIKE PENNYFEATHER:
    ***

    JUSTIFICATION: …HIGH-RISK PRISONER: …PRISON STABILITY: …PRISONER SAFETY.

    ***
    SOME PRISONERS ARE MORE AT ‘…HIGHER RISK’ FOR ‘…BLOWS’ THAN MOST OTHERS.
    ***
    IN THE ‘PENAL INSTITUTION,’ NO MATTER:

    (a) ‘…THE CONVICTED INDICTMENTS,:

    (b) …LENGTH OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCE:

    (c) …ALL HAVE THE SAME DARN STATUS: ‘…CONVICT OR PRISONER.’

    ***
    WRATH OF IRATE AND VENGEFUL CONVICTS:

    It was to ‘…PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE: that

    (a) ‘…SEVERAL POLICE CONVICTS’ HAD SUFFERED THE ‘…WRATH OF IRATE AND VENGEFUL CONVICTS:

    ***
    METHODOLOGIES: …SHEET/BLANKET SUBDUE

    In the ‘GENERAL POPULATION,’ among the ‘…METHODOLOGIES,’ used and continues to be so used, has reportedly been the …SHEET/BLANKET SUBDUE.’

    ***
    ENTIRE ‘…HEAD TO TOE’ WERE SAID TO HAVE BEEN

    (a) ‘…FORCEFULLY AND IRRESISTIBLY COVERED: then

    (b) …DEFENCELESSLY: AND MERCILESSLY: ‘…BLOWS MUCH MORE THAN RICE AND PEAS.

    ***
    ‘…Eef yu tink in dey nice, go up’ (Vernacular).

    ***

    WHAT THE HELL…!

    ***

    WELL, KEEP TO HELL AWAY FROM JAIL.

    ***

  6. I see nothing wrong in his sentence. Base on the evidence given, he never shoot at anyone. There was a confrontation between he and a man who had his vehicle with legal authority. The driver refused to hand over his vehicle to him and began to drive off. He immediately use his Licensed firearm and began to shoot at the car tyre to deflate the tyre and that was a bad decision he made. In the magistrate ruling, she said not even 3 or four bullets to burst the tyre but 12 which is more force than necessary. Which mean if it was 3 or 4 she could understand and think otherwise but 12 was a bad decision by him. He was only convicted for discharging a firearm in a public place and he got one year in prison which is reasonable. Ignorance of the Law on his behalf is no excuse but, the man who had his vehicle without Legal authority provoked him.

  7. WHAT THE HELL…! @LITTLE JOHNNY: …LICENSED FIREARM: NO: …DEPARTMENTALLY ISSUED? YES.
    ***

    Read tthe comment. Seemed intelligent enough.

    ***
    LAW IN OWN HANDS: DEPARTMENTALLY-ISSUED FIREARM: …NOT TO BE USED:

    (a) ‘…PERSONALLY TO RECOVER ‘…PRIVATE PROPERTY:

    (b) …SHALL BE USED ONLY OFFICIIALLY/LEGALLY:

    (c) …FOR SELF AND 3RD PARTY PROTECTION, WHILE IN THE ‘… EXECUTION OF DUTY?

    ***

    QUESTION

    WAS THE OFFICER IN FACT ‘…EXECUTING A LAWFUL DUTY?’

    THE STRAIGHT ANSWER IS ‘…NO. HE WAS NEVER SO DOING.

    ***

    WHAT THE HELL…!

    AS A ‘…LAW ENFORCER,’ PENALTY-WISE …LUCKIER THAN A ‘…RAM GOAT’ BEING SLAUGHTERED FOR FOOD.

    ***

  8. How did the driver got hold of Karim Warner personal vehicle in the first? If Karim didn’t give it to him then that is thefts. Karim as an officer of the law should used other measurements in retrieving his belongings by simple blocked the vehicle and then called for backup officers to get the driver out of the vehicle. I don’t agree of firing 12 rounds of shots at an occupied vehicle since the driver was not a threat or had a weapon.

  9. He needs to go 1735 and act like he did when he had the government weapon and in their uniform, so he tried to kill a man and this is the punishment 1year by Easter the guy out watch and see … BULL CRAP …… bout high profile since when little snatty nose boy that jus hurry push up in the force became high profile…

  10. Nothing to shaken up if I had to tell you the truth!! Guess he’s too civilized for 1735 but at the end of the day crime is crime, and maybe these officers need a little beating in prison to tell a testimony

  11. That was a Police issued service weapon and as Pompey stated above

    LAW IN OWN HANDS: DEPARTMENTALLY-ISSUED FIREARM: …NOT TO BE USED:

    (a) ‘…PERSONALLY TO RECOVER ‘…PRIVATE PROPERTY:

    (b) …SHALL BE USED ONLY OFFICIIALLY/LEGALLY:

    (c) …FOR SELF AND 3RD PARTY PROTECTION, WHILE IN THE ‘… EXECUTION OF DUTY?

    He had no right to bus shot behind the car NONE! He could of killed the driver, passenger or anyone unlucky enough to accidentally get in the way…. He was sometimes a jerk and that uniform made him feel like Vageta… That’s how life goes it humbles us eventually…

  12. you know what’s the funny part….MY TAX MONEY FUNDS THIS WITHOUT MY CONSENT….everytime I go shop and see ABST on the receipt….I will be a reminded how it’s giving this guy an easy life. yay me lmaooo lmaooo l lmaooo

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here