Criminal Law: Wendell Robinson: The Barrister

Rawlston Pompey

No governmental administration shall ever be seen as using or employing the ‘Judiciary’ to; (a) Frustrate; (b) Humiliate; (c) Repress; or (d) Uses any Commission, be it; ‘ABEC; Labour; Public or Police’ to exact egregious punishment upon any of its employees, and by extension its citizens. Neither shall an administration suffer any ‘Law Firm’ fleece resources not sufficiently flowing or adequately reserved in the national coffers. Moreover, no administration, shall encourage, facilitate, abide, counsel or aid any governmental agencies, departments or bodies to deny benefits legitimately earned, due and payable. They shall also not trespass upon the tolerance of those that have faithfully served the nation.

PERSPECTIVE

This commentary looks at the ‘7-member Police Service Commission (PSC),’ led by ‘Chairman Kelvin John’ and its handling of the ‘Wendell Robinson Affairs.’ More importantly, the commentary looks at his progress following his ‘Summary Dismissal.’ This resulted when the membership appeared to have gravely misguided themselves by making decisions the ‘Judiciary’ found to have been starved of procedural knowledge and want of justification. It also looks at the ‘Appellate Ruling’ and successful strides made in the ‘Legal Profession’ as a ‘Defence Attorney.’ Firstly, however, it looks of the behavior of the ‘Commission’ toward the faithful, loyal, competent and committed within the ‘Police Service.’

SUPREMACY OF GOD

Those recognizing the constitutional principle that acknowledges the ‘Supremacy of God,’ shall have no difficulty accepting the scriptural teachings. That has been the primary principle upon which this nation was founded [CO: 1981: Principal ‘A’]. One such teaching speaks to ‘Man’s heart’ as being deceitful and desperately wicked’ [Jeremiah 17: 9]. Accepting such teaching and believing the truthfulness of the ‘Holy Scriptures,’ few would deny that man has brought nothing, but frustration and miseries unto his fellow-men.

HOPELESSNESS AND UNCERTAINTY

Relating this to service organizations, more specifically, the ‘Police Service,’ it will have been seen that many devoted and deeply committed personnel have been distressed, demoralized and frustrated into a Sense of Hopelessness and Uncertainty.’ Such ‘Truths,’ may have manifested by the ill-advised decision to make vacant the office of ‘Commissioner of Police.’ While some personnel may have been their worst enemies, most have been given reasons to blame their frustration, miseries and stagnated positions upon those they continue to see as saboteurs to their chosen Law Enforcement Career. The readily identifiable culprit has been the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC).

IRRATIONAL DECISIONS

It shall be considered no exaggeration to say that ‘Irrational Decisions’ had been taken by members on both the ‘Police and Public Service Commissions.’ These have resulted in several officers initiating litigious proceedings against it. The litigating personnel had been driven to the ‘Judiciary,’ either in quest of (i) ‘…Social justice; or (ii) …Challenging their promotion policies; or (iii) …Discriminatory practices.’ Such was when aggrieved employees or Law enforcement personnel saw ‘Public authorities,’ in the instant case, the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC’ were given reasons to feel disadvantaged. Its membership has brought notoriety to the body when, summarily they have dismissed ‘former Commissioner of Police Wendell Robinson,’ without service benefits.

ANIMOSITY-FESTERED

A victimizing mentality and a culture and practice that seemed to have developed amongst members of the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC),’ were said to have been limited to a few nepotists. Police personnel have seen ‘an Animosity-Festered Police Service.’ They have seen disaffection rife among the rank-and-file members. An overwhelming majority has seen a practice, whereby personnel have been elevated beyond the level of their professional competencies. This was reported to have been observed by the faithful and loyal members of the ‘Police Service.’ Moreover, personnel now see identifiable members as threat to the welfare of the general membership of the Police Service.

INSULT TO INJURY

For instance, that which seemed to have troubled many personnel, has been ‘an Insult’ that was added to ‘Injury.’ Many personnel have not only expressed resentment to those on the ‘Police Service and Police Service Commission (PSC),’ but also abhorred practices viewed as ‘Cronyism; Nepotism and Insularity.’ Personnel have seen a ‘Fire Brigade Training Instructor’ being overlooked for elevation. They have also seen a ‘Female Recruit’ the training instructor had lectured some fourteen years ago at the ‘Sir Wright F. George Training Academy.’ These occurrences, they have viewed as vexatious to the human spirit and inimical to the welfare of all serving members within the ‘Police and Fire Brigade Services.’

REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS

From professional and administrative knowledge, except for one of these members, others had either prostituted their positions, opting for ‘Greener Pastures’ or for reasons of ‘Absenteeism,’ found ways to avoid their law enforcement duties. These are well-documented. Their membership on the ‘PSC’ has not only provoked accusation of a desire in bringing woe upon the loyal, faithful and competent personnel, but also accusations of either shown scant regard or contempt to that which some ‘Retirees’ and serving members have been seen as offensive to what has been considered ‘Reasonable Expectations.’

ACRIMONIOUSLY AND UNCEREMONIOUSLY

Having served the nation for some ‘32 years in Law enforcement,’ former Commissioner of Police ‘Wendell Robinson’ appeared to have been ‘Acrimoniously and Unceremoniously,’ removed from the office of ‘Commissioner of Police’ [Observer: November 25, 2019].’ Taking litigious action, the membership of the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC), resolutely, instructed their attorneys, ‘Watt and Associates,’ represented by ‘Dr. David Dorset’ to file counter Claims. These were intended to have the litigant’s Claims struck out, either for want of jurisdiction on matters of constitutionality.

STAY OF EXECUTION

The Civil Claims, heard by ‘Her Ladyship, Madame Justice Ann Marie Smith’ who allowed a four -day ‘Stay of Execution’ [Observer: March 31, 2021], the ‘PSC’ moved swiftly to engage the ‘Itinerant OECS Intermediate Court,’ the ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC). Contending that the hearing was flawed by procedural irregularities and inconsistencies in the manner the proceedings were conducted, the ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC),’ led by ‘Madame Chief Justice, Dame Janice Pereira,’ set aside the Judgment of ‘Her Ladyship Madame Justice Ann Marie Smith.’ Accepting those arguments, the ‘Appellate Court’ ordered that the ‘Litigant’s Claim’ be returned to the ‘High Court of Justice,’ and be heard by another Judge [May 21, 2021]. Guided by such directions, ‘His Lordship, Justice Peter Gordon Smith’ heard the litigant’s Claims [ANUHCV: 2020/0217],’ and accordingly ruled that the ‘Suspension’ from office’ borne no justification.

SUSPENSIONS AND DISMISSAL

The ‘Arbitrary Suspension’ and ‘Summary Dismissal’ of then ‘Commissioner of Police, Wendell Robinson,’ saw an enlightened ‘7-member Commission (PSC)’ bringing upon itself legal problems that necessitated ‘Judicial Intervention.’ The decision to ‘Suspend’ as well as the ‘Decision to Dismiss,’ seemed reek of acrimony and victimization. Whether or not acted on collective impulse or legally guided, through a non-disciplinary process the ‘PSC’ has done that which was not obtained anywhere in the ‘African Jungle.’ Instructively, these decisions were reportedly taken when members of ‘Reason and Conscience,’ unjustifiably ended his ‘Chosen Law Enforcement Career’ [October 26, 2020].

STATE OF EMBATTLEMENT

Firstly, in his preferred and chosen ‘Law Enforcement Career,’ at a time when ‘cronyism, nepotism and insularity’ were not necessarily militating factors against elevation. Consequently, ‘Wendell Robinson’ elevated from the rank of ‘Constable to Corporal to the Inspector.’ Forced into a ‘State of Embattlement,’ yet conscious of the fights ahead, the Litigant/Claimant appeared undaunted. He had made it demonstrably clear that whatever it took, with sinew and muscle, he was prepared to fight for that which was right, fair and just and that which represented the concept ‘Social Justice.’ He was accused of ‘professional indiscretions. The allegations were serious. The difficulties became monumental and the legal struggles mounted.

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

It all started with the accusatory lips of subordinates of inappropriate behavior. Then by perceived acts of acrimony, the embattled ‘Commissioner of Police’ experienced nothing but frustration, financial hardship and misery. These were worsened by a ‘Comedy of Errors’ by the ‘7-member Police Service Commission (PSC).’ Collaboratively, the ‘Police Retirees’ on the ‘Commission,’ having reached the ‘Mandatory Age of Retirement,’ lend support to membership. This occurred even as they continue to enjoy their ‘Retirement Benefits’ and gratuitously provided opportunities for another source of income.

SPECIAL PRIVILEGE

Noting that among its membership are three ‘Police Retirees,’ as former colleagues and superiors, many rank-and-file members saw their ‘Value’ to the ‘PSC’ as more ‘Numerical’ and supportive by ‘Yes Votes.’ This is particularly observed by decisions viewed as intended to demoralize and retard the progress of the ‘Competent,’ while creating opportunities for the ‘Incompetent.’ Many have seen their membership on the ‘PSC’ as void of merit. They have considered it a ‘Special Privilege’ than for their professional understanding of the human resource, its value and worth to law enforcement and by extension, the society and ‘Rule of Law.’

COMEDIC SEQUEL

There appeared to have been no end to the ‘Comedic Sequel.’ Making themselves ‘CARICOM Comedians,’ serving officers from ‘Barbados, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago,’ were accorded status of ‘Special Constables.’ They were directed to conduct investigations into allegations made against ‘former Commissioner of Police, Wendell Robinson.’ Consequent upon their findings, they were to prepare and serve disciplinary charges of ‘Discreditable Conduct’ against him. These were to be compliantly done under ‘Police Discipline Regulations.’ Unfamiliarity with the statutorily provided disciplinary regulations intended to address breaches of discipline committed by personnel of the ranks of; (i) ‘…Inspector: (ii) …Senior Sergeant; (iii) …Sergeant; (iv) …Corporal; and (v) …Constable,’ were wrongly followed and applied [Chapter 330].

SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL

To all intents and purposes, the body either ill-advisedly or misguidedly ‘Suspended him [Observer: April 5, 2018].  The aggrieved litigant, forced by necessity, instituted civil proceedings against the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC)’ for his ‘Suspensions and Dismissal’ from the ‘Police Service.’ It was made acrimoniously clear by the misguided application of disciplinary regulations not intended for ‘Gazetted Police officers.’ It was obvious that in their exuberance, the ‘PSC,’ had followed the wrong disciplinary procedures. In seeking redress and pursuit of ‘Social Justice,’ this necessitated intervention by the ‘Judiciary.

LEGAL FIGHTS

The ‘PSC’ membership was neither prepared to give in, nor give up without ‘Legal Fights.’ Causing visitation upon ‘Her Ladyship, Madame Justice Ann Marie Smith’s Judgment,’ the ’PSC,’ unhesitatingly resorted to the ‘Intermediate Appellate Court- ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC).’ Successfully challenging the ‘First Instance Judgment,’ the membership was placed in no advantageous position. The ‘Appellate Court,’ setting aside ‘Her Ladyship’s Ruling’ and simply ordered that another Judge conducting hearing into the ‘Claims, then at Bar. Ensuring that justice appeared to have been manifestly served, the ‘3-Member Appellate Court’ ordered that the ‘Civil Claims’ be referred back to the ‘First Instance Court.’

STATE RESOURCES

A ‘Second Suspension’ appeared most financially troubling to the ‘Litigant/Claimant, Wendell Robinson.’ While the ‘Litigant/Claimant’ struggled to meet legal fees, with unimpeded access to public funds, the membership litigiously and parasitically, delighted themselves in using ‘State Resources’ against him. Likened in the ‘First Instance Court,’ attorneys for the ‘PSC’ contended, and rightly so, that the aggrieved litigant had taken ‘Matters of Constitutionality’ before the wrong Court. It was further contended that the litigant had ignored provisions contained in the ‘Constitution Order,’ that allowed for the ‘Public Service Board of Appeal’ to perform its function [CO: 1981: Section 107 (d)].

JUDICIAL HEARING

Firstly, when the matter was given ‘Judicial Hearing,’ rightly or wrongly, ‘Her Ladyship, Madame Justice Anne Marie Smith’ determined that the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC)’ showed no lawful procedural basis for the initial ‘Suspension.’ Consequently, the judicial proceedings saw an unfavorable ‘High Court’ decision being delivered against it. In the ‘Judgment, ‘Her Ladyship’ closely looked at the statutory provision that unambiguously states; ‘The Commission may order the dismissal from the Force of any ‘Inspector, Subordinate Police officer or Constable’ for any breach of any regulations made under this Act’ [Section 34: Police Act: Chapter 330].

MATTERS OF CONSTITUTIONALITY

Be that as it may, ‘Her Ladyship’ appeared not to have been sufficiently persuaded, proceeded with ‘Civil Claims’ that were at Bar, and delivered a judgment adverse to the ‘PSC.’ This however, was short-lived. Given that which is contained in the disciplinary provisions, ‘Her Ladyship’ gave careful judicial scrutiny at the statutory disciplinary provisions [Sections 34 & 37: Police Act: Chapter 330]. That which remains irrefutable, has been the regulations cited, are applicable only to: (i) …Inspectors: (ii) Subordinate Police officers; and (iii) Constables.’

STAY OF EXECUTION

Allowed a four -day ‘Stay of Execution’ [Observer: March 31, 2021], the ‘PSC’ moved swiftly to engage the ‘Itinerant OECS Intermediate Court,’ the ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC). Charging judicial irregularities and inconsistencies in the manner the proceedings were conducted, the ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC),’ led by ‘Madame Chief Justice, Dame Janice Pereira,’ set aside the Judgment of ‘Her Ladyship.’ The ‘Superior Appellate Court’ ordered that the ‘Litigant’s Claim’ be returned to the ‘High Court of Justice,’ and be heard by another Judge [May 21, 2021]. As its membership shouted with glee, the litigant and Claimant ‘Wendell Robinson’ frustrated and financially-challenged, had been plunged deeper into ‘Financial Misery.’

JUDICIALLY CORRECT

Concerning the constitutionality of the issues raised, given and guided by two earlier ‘Judgments’ respecting the contentious and Summary Dismissal of then ‘Commissioner of Police Gary Nelson,’ [Gary Nelson v Attorney General et al’ ANUHCV: 2008/0552 & HCVAP: 2009/011], the arguments advanced by attorneys for the ‘PSC,’ would have been judicially correct. Still, appearing neither convinced nor persuaded that the legislators intended the provisions to be applied against officers above the Inspectorate rank, guided by these provisions and directing herself, ‘Her Ladyship’ accordingly, delivered a ‘Judgement’ contrary to the expectations of members of the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC).

PROCEDURAL DEFICIENCIES

Guided by such directions, ‘His Lordship, Justice Peter Gordon Smith’ heard the Litigant’s Claims [ANUHCV: 2020/0217].’ He too, ruled that the ‘Suspension’ from office’ borne no justification. Recognizing ‘Procedural Deficiencies’ as they affect ‘Disciplinary Regulations’ to address conduct inconsistent with good discipline by officers above the rank of ‘Inspector of Police,’ he continues ‘It could mean that the Legislature intends a different regime for the disciplining of senior officers.’ His Lordship,’ advisedly, yet discretely suggested the ‘promulgation of democratically applicable regulations by the Police Service Commission for the disciplining police officers under its powers’ [ANUHCV: 2020/0217].

SUMMARILY DISMISSED

The provision contained in the ‘Police Act,’ states; ‘An Inspector, Subordinate Police officer or Constable against whom a complaint, information or charge is made for breach of any disciplinary regulations made under this Act, may, and until the final determination of such complaint or charge, be ‘Suspended from Office’ and placed on half pay by the Commission’ [Section 37: Police Act: Chapter 330]. The composition of the ‘Commission’ included ‘six Men’ and one ‘Woman.’ They were intelligent; of high repute and good standing on the august body. Yet heartlessly and punishingly, the membership ‘Denied’ him duly accrued ‘Service Benefits.’ This occurred when, collectively, unanimously and abruptly, and likened to ‘expatriate Commissioner Gary Nelson,’ they ‘Summarily Dismissed’ him from the ‘Police Service’ [ANR: November 26, 2019].

SENTIMENTAL HYPOCRISY

Instructively, only ‘former Commissioner Truehart Smith’ who took his ‘Suspension’ to the constitutionally-symbolic and powerless ‘Public Service Board of Appeal.’ Even with a ‘Favorable Ruling’ by this body, the membership of the ‘PSC’ then, showed complete disregard to the constitutional body. Neither himself, nor any other ‘Suspended or Sacked’ Commissioner,’ ever returned to the office of Commissioner. Respecting the ‘Judgment’ of ‘Her Ladyship, Madame Justice Ann Marie Smith,’ expressing ‘Sentimental Hypocrisy,’ through the voice of its ‘Attorney Dr. David Dorsett,’ members of the ‘PSC’ were to be saying; ‘The Police Service Commission acknowledges the important and indispensable role of the Court in the delivery of justice to persons who are at the decisions of public authorities.’

EXPRESSING DISSENT

With the knowledge possess and experience gained from a legal practice and at the ‘Bar’ as Acting Judge with the ‘Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC,’ ‘Kelvin John,’ the duly appointed Chairman, led six other members. Among them were ‘three Retirees from the Police Service’ [2014-]. Though not necessarily to be apportioned blame, still with their individual and collective knowledge of ‘Force Discipline; Rules and Procedures,’ the Commission’ shall not have made three fundamental procedural blunders. Clearly ‘Expressing Dissent’ on behalf of the ’PSC,’ Attorney continued; ‘However, the Police Service Commission findings on the declaration made by ‘Her Ladyship Madame Justice Ann Marie Smith’ concerning., and on account of that concern, is mounting an appeal against the decision’ [Observer: March 27, 2021].

SUSPENDED OR SACKED

Apart from the unfortunate ‘Wendell Robinson’ [November 26, 2020], of academic interest has been the fate of several other ‘Suspended or Sacked’ Commissioners of Police.’ His suspension and dismissal’ have evoked memories of the fate of others. These included; ‘Suspended Commissioners (i) ‘Truehart Smith OM, QPM [Montserrat Reporter Vol xvii No.12 April 4, 2003]; and (ii) Vere Browne’ [Pride News: January 21, 2015]; and ‘Summarily Removed Commissioners; (iii) …Delano Christopher [2008]; and (iv) …Expatriate Canadian national, Gary Nelson [2010].

SIMILAR DECISION

Mindbogglingly, with an adequately and competently staffed ‘Ministry of Legal Affairs and Justice,’ availing itself of ‘State Resources,’ the Commission, through legal contractual arrangements with certain ‘Law Firms,’ had sought through the Judiciary, to correct two procedurally-incorrect ‘Suspensions’ and an acrimonious ‘Dismissal.’ Seemingly hell bent on increasing his miseries, the ‘PSC’s’ attorneys ‘Watt and Associates,’ through ‘Dr. David Dorsett,’ successfully petitioned the ‘Appellate Court’ to dismiss the ‘Constitutional Claims.’ Compliant with the orders,’ ‘His Lordship, Justice Peter Gordon Smith’ and concluding the hearing, arrived at a similar decision.

DISSENTLY ANGRY

Carefully observing the procedures followed by the ’Police Service Commission (PSC)’ in making its decisions, ‘His Lordship Justice Peter Gordon Smith’ concluded that the ‘PSC’ and its attorneys had faltered in their interpretation of the law. Consequently, he may have made ‘Chairman Kelvin John,’ with the ‘CCJ’ Commissioners, namely; Claudette Brathwaite-Mason; Cosmas Marcelle: James Hill: and Ewart ‘Lee’ Williams: Regis Burton: and Rupert Pell (deceased); ‘Dissentingly Angry.’ Showing contempt to the ‘Judgement,’ hardly rising from the ‘Bar’ to retire to the ‘Judges Chambers,’ the ‘Litigant/Claimant, Wendell Robinson’ was again slapped with another ‘Suspension’ [October 26, 2018].

INAPPLICABLE TO APPLICANT

His Lordship knew that glass, in whatever shape or form was neither flexible nor stretchable. Submitting that the regulations were applicable to the ‘Litigant,’ subtly, ‘His Lordship’ wrote; ‘To attempt to adapt to include the Commissioner, would be to force it, like ‘Cinderella’s Glass Slippers’ onto a foot that cannot fit into it’ [ANUHCV: 2018/0202]. He was adamant that the statutory provisions referred, argued, and relied upon by its attorneys, were ‘Inapplicable to the Litigant.’ The applicability of such provisions was to officers of certain ranks as the statute stipulates’ [Sections 34 and 37: Police Act: Chapter 330]. The legal battle continues.

ASPIRE AND ACHIEVE

The ambitious have always endeavored to ‘Aspire and Achieve.’ His aspirations and achievements differ from most. Contrastingly, others that have pursued certain studies or seized opportunities for ‘Self-Actualization,’ had in fact distanced themselves from active policing and police-related duties. Some became Side-walk and building contractors and vendors; some Soup kitchen directors; and some private security contractors.’ These were mostly supplemental to the meagre salaries and ‘Non-Risk Allowance.’ Thus, they had positioned themselves to earn and possess more disposable income. Some officers not performing active police duties, appear to have become ‘Very Happy’ [Commissioner Atlee Rodney]. Those enjoying ‘Happiness’ appear to have completely divorced themselves from the Police Service.

UNSOLICITED SECONDMENT

Unlike those that had prostituted on the Police Service, ‘Wendell Robinson’ made it demonstrably ‘Pellucid’ [Sir Lester Bird] that he was trained for no other role, but Law enforcement. For instance, he was not amused, and disdainfully declined a ‘Cabinet-approved Secondment’ to the ‘Office of National Drug Control and Prevention Policy (ONDCP).’ Void of consultations, such ‘Unsolicited Secondment’ will have uncomfortably placed him under the ‘Directorship’ of then ‘Drug Czar Renford Ferrance’ [1999].

WAR OF ATTRITION

Beyond every dark cloud is said to be a ‘Silver Lining.’ At the end of the tunnel, no matter how feint, there is also said to be light.  There is also ‘Hope’ for the ‘Hopeful.’ With a steely resolve and will to ‘Survive and Succeed,’ if man is to prevail over man-made adversities, man must constantly strive to overcome them. This may have been the philosophical approach to adversities said to have been brought upon ‘Wendell Robinson 54,’ by a ‘Police Service Commission (PSC).’ Seemingly indulge in a ‘War of Attrition’ and transfixed on acrimonious punishment, its membership had wasted little time in bringing an end to a successful career. In the face of such adversities, he too may have come to the realization that in life, there is turmoil and confusion. Yet, it is filled with opportunities and endless possibilities.

PERSEVERED – PURSUED – PREVAILED

Seemingly philosophically guided by the cliché; ‘Where there is a will, there is a way,’ the Litigant/Respondent, ‘Persevered; Pursued and Prevailed.’ From professional and administrative knowledge, unlike some personnel many known to have prostituted upon the ‘Police Service,’ ‘Wendell Robinson’ had used it only as a spring board to achieving a ‘Legal Career.’ Having underwent and successfully completed legal studies, he returned to active ‘Police Duties.’ This, undoubtedly, speaks to ‘Undivided Loyalty’ to the ‘Police Service; the citizenry and the nation.’ There was devotion to duty and deep commitment that in a civilized society, whatever the considerations, order and the ‘Rule of Law’ shall prevail.

PURPOSE AND PATRIOTISM

Thus, with a deep sense of ‘Purpose and Patriotism,’ he acquitted himself exceedingly well. Wendell Robinson saw himself only as a professional. He pursued set and attainable ‘Professional Goals.’ For instance, during his tenure, he successfully completed legal studies in the ‘United Kingdom.’ Then upon returning, he continued his professional law enforcement career. On active police duties, he served at the ‘Criminal Investigations Department.’ Subsequently he headed the ‘Police Prosecution Unit.’ Then as ‘Retirement Vacancies’ allowed, he moved up the ranks rapidly. Then eventually to the enviable position of ‘Commissioner of Police.’ This resulted after the ‘Suspension of Commissioner of Police Vere Browne [2015].’ He was well- positioned to fill the vacancy. [2015 – 2018].

ALL THAT WAS YESTERDAY

Yester-Year, he has enjoyed a successful ‘Law enforcement Career.’ This reportedly spanned 32 years before being ‘Summarily Sacked.’ He has encountered adversities of one kind or another. He has seen the sun shining, yet not positioned to make hay. When the days darkened, it was not necessarily that rain fell. The ‘Saharan Dust’ had placed a spell of obscurity in its path. Yet he was able to negotiate life’s winding path. His most memorable assignment was when he opted for the prestigious assignment at the office of the ‘Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).’ Then under the ‘Prosecutorial Directions and watch of Cosbert Cumberbatch,’ he functioned in the capacity of ‘Counsel for the Crown’ [2001-2005]. Whatever his troubles, ‘All that was Yesterday’ [Eddie Mello].

CONCLUSION

Today, amidst his trials and tribulations, calamities and adversities, lengthy legal battles, he has embarked upon a ‘Private Legal Practice.’ Such practice includes (a) ‘…Civil litigation; and (ii) …Criminal Defence.’ In these practices, he continues to stride and strive. Clients, including litigants, defendants and persons accused of serious acts of criminality, have been keeping his Chambers extraordinarily busy. Thus, few attorneys may be seen as rivals or have been in demand for the legal services, as those he provides. Whatever may have been placed in his path as hindrances, obstacles and hurdles, he has surmounted them all. As a practicing ‘Barrister-at-Law,’ he continues to ‘Soar Like an Eagle.’ Even so, he remains optimistic that his legal struggles with the ‘Police Service Commission (PSC)’ will be ceased, and though somewhat illusive, ‘Social Justice’ will soon be achieved. Acknowledged by the people as ‘Supreme’ [CO: 1981: Founding Principle: ‘A’], ‘God’ bless the nation– ‘Antigua and Barbuda.’ ***

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]