Court to Decide Whether Chantel Crump Murder Case Proceeds

4
(Photo designed by Probuzz Marketing)

A magistrate is expected to decide today whether the case against a woman accused of killing nine-year-old Chantel Crump will proceed to trial.

Angela Mejia has been on remand at His Majesty’s Prison for nearly a year following her arrest. The matter returns to the St John’s Magistrates Court after multiple delays.

At the previous hearing, defence attorney Wendel Alexander urged the court to either move the case forward or dismiss it, arguing that his client should not remain in custody while prosecutors continue their preparations.

The case has been adjourned five times, prompting the defence to file for dismissal on the grounds of lack of prosecution. A second bail application was also denied.

Chief Magistrate Ngaio Emanuel granted a final adjournment last month, noting that the case file was still under review by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

During today’s hearing, the court is expected to hold a committal proceeding to determine whether there is enough evidence for the matter to be sent to the High Court.

If insufficient evidence is presented, the case could be dismissed and Mejia released.

Chantel Crump’s body was found in the Weatherills area on 15 March 2025. Police said she had been taken by a woman in a vehicle days earlier.

The case has attracted significant public attention, with today’s ruling likely to determine whether it proceeds to trial or is brought to an end.

Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]

4 COMMENTS

  1. so what you all trying to say if this go her way the baby life gone for nothing ,this won’t be fair but you know what God is not sleeping and she will never know peace cause she may have all the answers but as old people say duppy know who fu frightened but me know in my book me one na lost I rest my case

  2. WHAT THE HELL…! …COURT TO DECIDE: …
    ***
    WELL
    From a professional perspective:

    (i) ‘…SHOULD COURT BE INFORMED BY THE DPP: that

    (ii) …SAMPLES DISPATCHED, IF AT ALL DISPATCHED FOR FORENSIC TESTS: have

    (iii) …HAVE NOT YET RETURNED TO ALLOW: for

    (iv) … FILING OF STATEMENTS/DEPOSITIONS: and

    (b) …TO ALLOW FOR A ‘FIAT’ FOR ‘…COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS: and

    (c) …GRANT FURTHER ADJOURNMENT:’ given

    (i) ‘…THE INTEREST NATIONALLY GENERATED:

    (ii) …THE NATIONAL CALL FOR JUSTICE: then

    (iii) …WHOMEVER IT SHALL BE:

    (iv) …THE COURT SHALL BE SEEN: as

    (a) ‘…INSENSITIVE:

    (b) …INTOLERANT: and

    (c) …PROVOCATIVELY STUPID.’

    ***

    WHAT THE HELL: are

    (i) ‘…ASSIGNED CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS: and

    (ii) …COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, EVERTON JEFFERS KPM MIGHT JUST BE DOING:

    (a) …LOAFING: and

    (b) …PREACHING?

    ***
    NOW: …THE QUESTION IS:

    ‘…WHAT THE HELL, THE GRIEVING FAMILY AND ANXIOUS CITIZENS MUST DO?’

    ***

    WALK GOOD: BUT NOWHERE TO ‘…NEWFIELD,’ THOUGH.

    ***

  3. But wasn’t it Angela who lead police to where the body was ????????
    What more evidence is needed ??
    She was either the killer or an accomplice.

    Antigua Judicial System Is Crap.

    Mr Pompey – gimme your take on this situation please.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here