The case against the five women who were involved in the cemetery brawl last week, has been dismissed.
The prosecution appeared before the court on Thursday along with defense attorneys Wendel Alexander and Joanne Massiah, to tell the court that the parties involved no longer wished to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, the prosecution withdrew the case and the trial date in February 2025 was vacated. The court has learnt that the five women involved in the brawl are all related.
However, the case against Ty Thomas who discharged a firearm in the cemetery, will proceed on December 4 as was decided by the court.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
So was his discharging his firearm related to that brawl?
Just asking.
Not taking away from the seriousness of discharging the firearm in a public setting.
WHAT THE HELL! …MAGISTERIAL BUFFONERY…? …PROSECUTORIAL RECKLESSNESS
Every Police investigator shall ‘…KNOW’ that in any ‘…FIST FIGHT,’ (in the ring or otherwise), there will be ‘…BLOWS.’
Thus, in all ‘…DISORDERLY CONDUCT (FIGHTING),’ both parties will exchange ‘…BLOWS.’
Some ‘…FIGHTERS’ will share ‘…MORE’ than they ‘RECEIVE.’
*****
BATTERY OR BEATING
None of the alleged ‘…CRIMINAL CHARGES were ever ones that the ‘…DISORDERLY MOURNERS’ had:
(i) ‘…PROSECUTORIAL SAY: or
(ii) …A NON-PROSECUTORIAL SAY.’
THE ‘…SAY’
The ‘SAY’ resides only with the ‘…COMPLAINANT- THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE.’
‘
QUESTION
‘…Would the ‘…CHARGES’ against ‘…Police Sergeant ‘…KARIM WARNER’ be also ‘…DISMISSED?’ [WILLIKIES: December 3, 2023].
*****
PUBLIC INQUIRY
The ‘…WITHDRAWAL’ of the CHARGES,’ is so darn serious, that it requires a ‘…PUBLIC INQUIRY’ into:
(a) ‘…BEHAVIOR OF THE POLICE PROSECUTOR: and
(b) …The Non-Adjudicating Magistrate.’
WHY
The Conduct of the ‘…MOURNERS,’ not only appeared ‘…DISORDERLY,’ but also speaks to despicability.
NOW
If the information reported at ‘…ANR’s News Portal,’ is true, then it shall be exclaimed: ‘…WHAT THE HELL!’
Should it be correctly reported, then it shall be:
(a) ‘…LAUGHABLE: at the apparent
(b) ‘…MAKING MAGISTERIAL MOCKERY: and
(c) …PROSECUTORIAL BUFFOONERY.’
Such is not only capable of being seen as:
(c) …SCANDALOUS: but also
(d) …PROSECUTORIALLY RECKLESS.’
*****
PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTORIAL KNOWLEDGE/EXPERIENCE
Readers shall know that from ‘…PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTORIAL KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE,’ the word ‘…DISMISSED,’ is not consistent with the ‘…ACTUAL CONDUCT OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL.’
HERE’S WHY
(i) ‘…In the instant Case, no ‘…EVIDENCE IN CHIEF’ was led by an apparent ‘…INCOMPETENT POLICE PROSECUTOR:
(ii) …There was no ‘…CROSS EXAMINATION’ by the clearly:
(a) …PROFESSIONALLY LEARNED:
(b) …CRAFTY: and
(c) …EXPLOITABLY CUNNING DEFENCE ATTORNEYS.’
PROSECUTORIALLY: …PUBLIC ORDER/ PUBLIC INTEREST
Without fear of contradiction, neither:
(a) ‘…RESPECT FOR THE DEAD’ [Section 18: (3): Small Charges Act: Chapter 405]:
(b) …PUBLIC ORDER:
(c) …PUBLIC INTEREST: nor
(d) …THE RULE OF LAW’ was served.
TEACHABLE MOMENT
This is a ‘…TEACHABLE MOMENT.’
READ SECTION 18: (3): SMALL CHARGES ACT: CHAPTER 405.’
*****
NOTE: …FEAR NO EVIL
BE IT WITHIN THE ‘…MAGISTERACY OR POLICE PROSECUTIONS,’ persons appearing to be starved for ‘…KNOWLEDGE/COMPETENCE,’ shall be replaced by the more ‘…Knowledgeable and Competent Professionals.’
Their professional competence appeared ‘…BAD FOR THE RULE OF LAW.’
FEAR NO DARN EVIL.
Comments are closed.