Authorities have marked 155 abandoned vehicles for removal in the first phase of the government’s nationwide cleanup campaign, according to the National Solid Waste Management Authority.
General Manager Indira Henry said during a press conference that the initial sweep covered the Villa and Point areas, where 75 vehicles were tagged by police for removal. An additional 80 vehicles were later identified in the Yorks area as the program expanded.
The campaign, launched this week, is described by Health Minister Sir Molwyn Joseph as a “deep, deep cleanup” of Antigua and Barbuda aimed at restoring the country’s appearance and improving public health. The operation involves the Defense Force, Solid Waste, the Central Board of Health, and Public Works.
Under the initiative, derelict homes, overgrown lots, and unsightly fences will also be addressed. Property owners who fail to maintain their premises after official cleanups could face charges added to their property value under existing legislation.
Officials said cleanup efforts are being conducted using mapped grids to systematically target each community. Once the first sector is completed, teams will move into Yorks and other districts in the coming weeks.
Sir Molwyn said the government intends to make the cleanup an ongoing, structured effort linked to health, sanitation, and national pride.
Advertise with the mоѕt vіѕіtеd nеwѕ ѕіtе іn Antigua!
We offer fully customizable and flexible digital marketing packages.
Contact us at [email protected]
And rightly so. Some folks know that the things they have are not good and not working anymore, yet they don’t want to get rid of them. Unsightly!
Just hope friends and colleagues of the people responsible for the removal won’t be given a break and people won’t go to their representative with flimsy excuses to get away, it has been done in the past under both administration. Oh hurry up and come Round South
While no one is against the removal of derelict vehicles from the public roadways, I understand that vehicles on a person’s private property are also target for removal. That certainly cannot be the case. As far as I am still aware, we live in a democratic, capitalist society where private property is sacrosanct. How then can a derelict vehicle on private property be removed without the consent of the property owner?
Election will be call next year ! Remember the date this was written.
This morning (Tuesday 14th October 2025) at approximately 10:00am, I observed a police pickup (ABP 122) driving around Yorks Village by a police officer, with persons who appear to be Defence Force personnel in the said vehicle.
Two of these persons were in the back/bay of the pickup truck (AB 122).
The Defence Force Personnel in the back/bay of the truck would enter on to persons PRIVATE PROPERTY and put an X on vehicle, I suspect they believe to be derelict (I don’t know how they determine that).
Is this legal? CAN ‘OFFICERS’ SIMPLY WALK ON TO PRIVATE PROPERTY LIKE THAT?
I spoke to a neighbor of mine (a former police officer) because I observe a vehicle on his property was marked, and he told me when he heard his dog barking and he looked out and questioned the person who appear to be a Defence Force Officer, and told the person he was on private property, the person told him ‘you don’t see the uniform’.
What is going on here?
The Commissioner of Police needs to say something about this.
I suspect that the Attorney General, the Commissioner of Police and the officers can be sued for entering illegally on private property.
Sad to say that Sir Molwyn says things to impress…. Several years a similar clean up exercise was initiated but was never completed. Vehicles are still at the side of the roads with the big red X but nothing was done.
It is full time that persons should be taxed or pay a license for ALL vehicles ( running or not ) occupying the road
WHAT THE HELL…! …MARKING VEHICLES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY?
WHAT?: …IDIOTS EXPLOITING THE IDIOTS…? …LESSON-‘…ABC’
***
@TABOR & AUDLEY DAVE JOSEPH aka BEEF.
***
These have been two commenters, whose rationalized ‘…Legal and Personalized’ views have made ‘…GOOD SENSE.’
***
NOW:
If that which was alluded to, in actuality, occurred in ‘…ST, JOHN’S CITY,’, then this appears to be a clear case where ‘…THE IDIOTS HAVE LED THE IDIOTS.’
***
HERE IS WHY:
Guided by the ‘…LITTER ACT,’ this is what it unambiguously states’
(i) ‘…REMOVAL OF DERELICT VEHICLES:
(ii) …FROM PUBLIC PLACE:
***
THIS IS THE ‘…ABC LESSON FOR ‘…SENSIBLE PEOPLE’ ONLY.
***
‘…WHERE ANY DERELICT VEHICLE: is
(a) ‘…LEFT IN ANY PUBLIC PLACE: in
(b) …SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES: as’
(c) …TO CAUSE: or
(d) …CONTRIBUTE TO: or
(e) …TEND TO THE DEFACEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT: by
(f) …REASON OF THE PRESENCE OF SUCH DERELICT VEHICLE: the
(g) …THE LOCAL AUTHORITY:
NOTE WELL:
THE ‘LOCAL AUTHORITIES’ MEANS:
(i) ‘…CENTRAL BOARD OF HEALTH:or
(ii) …NATIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (NSWMA}: or
(iii) …BOTH, AS THE PARTICULAR CONTEXTS PERMITS'[Litter Act: Section 2: No.3 of 2019].
***
Now, ‘…BEEF’ and my former law enforcement colleague’…SUPERINTENDENT WINSTON JOHN,’ may see that they had encountered some ‘…REAL IDIOTS.’
***
INDIRA GHANDI OR INDIRA HENRY,’ ARE NOT IN THIS GROUP.’
SHE APPEARED TO HAVE EXPLOITED THEIR ‘…IDIOCY.’ CHEERS TO ‘…INDI.’
***
THE AUTHORITIES: may
(h) …GIVE NOTICE TO THE OWNER: or
(i) …LAST KNOWN OWNER: thereby
(j) …REQUIRING HIM/HER: to
(k) …REMOVE THE DERELICT VEHICLE: from
(l) …THE PUBLIC ROAD:
(m) …WITHIN 24-HOURS: of
(n) …SERVICE OF THE NOTICE’ [Litter Act: Section 13 (1): No.3 of 2019].
***
WHEN OWNER COULD NOT BE DETERMINED/REACHED TO SERVICE NOTICE:
***
Parliament anticipated that such might be experienced by the ‘…LOCAL AUTHORITY,’ and provided this ‘…LEGAL PROVISION,’ not for ‘…IDIOTS,’ but for ‘…SENSIBLE PEOPLE.’
***
IT STATES:
‘…WHERE THE LAST OWNER CANNOT:
(a) ‘…CANNOT BE DETERMINED: or
(bi) …CANNOT BE FOUND:
(i) ‘…A NOTICE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SAID DERELICT VEHICLE:
(ii) …ADVISING THE OWNER: that
(iii) …IF THE SAID DERELICT VEHICLE: is
(iv) …NOT REMOVED WITHIN 48-HOURS: it
(v) …WILL BE REMOVED BY THE AUTHORITIES’ [Litter Act: Section 13 (2) No. 3 of 2019].
***
THE ASSINITY OF LAW:
Now, here is the ‘..ASSINITY OF THE LAW.’ and could cause ‘…IDIOTS TO BEHAVE IDIOTIC.’
***
The ‘…LITTER ACT’ states:
‘…NOTHWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBSECTIONS 1 AND 2:
(a) ‘…THE AUTHORITIES: may
(b) …AT ANYTIME: and
(c) …WITHOUT GIVING NOTICE:
(d) …REMOVE ANY DERELICT VEHICLE: found
(e) …IN ANY PUBLIC PLACE: or
(f) …ON ANY PREMISES” [Litter Act: Section 13 (3): No. 3 of 2019].
THIS IS STATUTE LAW.
***
THIS IS THE SUPREME LAW- THE CONSTITUTION ORDER
***
IT IS NOT FOR ‘…IDIOTS,’ BUT FOR ‘…SENSIBLE PEOPLE.’
***
IT STATES:
EXCEPT WITH HIS/HER OWN CONSENT, NO PERSON (including Police officers) SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO ‘…ENTRY BY OTHER ON HIS PREMISES’ [CO: 1981: Section 10 (1)].
***
THERE ARE SEVERAL PROVISOS THAT ALLOW FOR THE ‘AUTHORITIES’ TO ACT,’ BUT ‘…IDIOTS,…?’
AH AH! THEY DO NOT HAVE SENSE.
***
SENSIBLE PEOPLE, MUST KNOW THAT LIKENED:to
(a) ‘…ENTERING PRIVAT PROPERTY: to
(b) …CONDUCT SEARCHES: for concealed
(c) … FIREARMS:
(d) …AMMUNITION:
(e) …DRUGS: and
(f) …CHARLES TABOR ‘…BRONCO: they
(g) …REQUIRE ‘…WARRANTS’ FROM THE MAGISTRATE’S COURTS, TO DO SO.’
***
THIS HAS BEEN THE ‘…ABC’ THAT ‘…IDIOTS’ SHALL LEARN.’
***
WHAT THE HELL…! …END OF LESSON.
***
(i) …R
***
Comments are closed.